CABG versus PCI in multilesional vessel disease

Yi Chih Wang, Juey Jen Hwang, Jiunn-Lee Lin

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

With numerous trials conducted during the 1970s and 1980s evaluating coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) versus medical treatment for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), the absolute benefi t of surgery was shown to be prominent especially for those with more extensive coronary involvement. However, the pronounced effect of CABG for patients with multivessel CAD (MVD) has faced continuing challenges since the introduction of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and evolving revascularization technology, such as coronary stents.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCoronary Graft Failure
Subtitle of host publicationState of the Art
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages161-165
Number of pages5
ISBN (Electronic)9783319265155
ISBN (Print)9783319265131
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Coronary Artery Bypass
Coronary Artery Disease
Stents
Technology
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Bare metal stent (BMS)
  • Coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG)
  • Coronary artery disease (CAD)
  • Drugeluting stent (DES)
  • Multivessel disease (MVD)
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
  • Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)
  • Revascularization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Wang, Y. C., Hwang, J. J., & Lin, J-L. (2016). CABG versus PCI in multilesional vessel disease. In Coronary Graft Failure: State of the Art (pp. 161-165). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26515-5_15

CABG versus PCI in multilesional vessel disease. / Wang, Yi Chih; Hwang, Juey Jen; Lin, Jiunn-Lee.

Coronary Graft Failure: State of the Art. Springer International Publishing, 2016. p. 161-165.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Wang, YC, Hwang, JJ & Lin, J-L 2016, CABG versus PCI in multilesional vessel disease. in Coronary Graft Failure: State of the Art. Springer International Publishing, pp. 161-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26515-5_15
Wang YC, Hwang JJ, Lin J-L. CABG versus PCI in multilesional vessel disease. In Coronary Graft Failure: State of the Art. Springer International Publishing. 2016. p. 161-165 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26515-5_15
Wang, Yi Chih ; Hwang, Juey Jen ; Lin, Jiunn-Lee. / CABG versus PCI in multilesional vessel disease. Coronary Graft Failure: State of the Art. Springer International Publishing, 2016. pp. 161-165
@inbook{15bd88e09adf42a298e6fdcd75423b2e,
title = "CABG versus PCI in multilesional vessel disease",
abstract = "With numerous trials conducted during the 1970s and 1980s evaluating coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) versus medical treatment for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), the absolute benefi t of surgery was shown to be prominent especially for those with more extensive coronary involvement. However, the pronounced effect of CABG for patients with multivessel CAD (MVD) has faced continuing challenges since the introduction of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and evolving revascularization technology, such as coronary stents.",
keywords = "Bare metal stent (BMS), Coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), Coronary artery disease (CAD), Drugeluting stent (DES), Multivessel disease (MVD), Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), Revascularization",
author = "Wang, {Yi Chih} and Hwang, {Juey Jen} and Jiunn-Lee Lin",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-26515-5_15",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783319265131",
pages = "161--165",
booktitle = "Coronary Graft Failure",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - CABG versus PCI in multilesional vessel disease

AU - Wang, Yi Chih

AU - Hwang, Juey Jen

AU - Lin, Jiunn-Lee

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - With numerous trials conducted during the 1970s and 1980s evaluating coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) versus medical treatment for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), the absolute benefi t of surgery was shown to be prominent especially for those with more extensive coronary involvement. However, the pronounced effect of CABG for patients with multivessel CAD (MVD) has faced continuing challenges since the introduction of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and evolving revascularization technology, such as coronary stents.

AB - With numerous trials conducted during the 1970s and 1980s evaluating coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) versus medical treatment for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), the absolute benefi t of surgery was shown to be prominent especially for those with more extensive coronary involvement. However, the pronounced effect of CABG for patients with multivessel CAD (MVD) has faced continuing challenges since the introduction of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and evolving revascularization technology, such as coronary stents.

KW - Bare metal stent (BMS)

KW - Coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG)

KW - Coronary artery disease (CAD)

KW - Drugeluting stent (DES)

KW - Multivessel disease (MVD)

KW - Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)

KW - Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)

KW - Revascularization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978254085&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978254085&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-26515-5_15

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-26515-5_15

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84978254085

SN - 9783319265131

SP - 161

EP - 165

BT - Coronary Graft Failure

PB - Springer International Publishing

ER -