Blood pressure biofeedback exerts intermediate-term effects on blood pressure and pressure reactivity in individuals with mild hypertension: A randomized controlled study

Pei-Shan Tsai, Nen-Chung Chang, Wen-Yin Chang, Pi-Hsia Lee, Mei Yeh Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This randomized controlled study examined whether a 4-week blood pressure (BP) biofeedback program can reduce BP and BP reactivity to stress in participants with mild hypertension. Methods: Participants in the active biofeedback group (n = 20) were trained in 4 weekly laboratory sessions to self-regulate their BP with continuous BP feedback signals, whereas participants in the sham biofeedback group (n = 18) were told to manipulate their BP without feedback signals. BP, skin temperature, skin conductance, BP reactivity to stress, body weight, and state anxiety were assessed before training and repeated at the eighth week after the training. Results: The decreases in systolic (12.6 ± 8.8 versus 4.1 ± 5.7) and mean BP (8.2 ± 6.9 versus 3.3 ± 4.9) from baseline at week 12 follow-up were significantly greater in the active biofeedback group compared with the sham biofeedback group (p = 0.001 and 0.017, respectively). Results from analysis of covariance with the follow-up systolic blood pressure (SBP) (or mean arterial pressure [MAP]) as the dependent variable, baseline SBP (or MAP) as the covariate, and group as the independent variable showed that biofeedback training effectively lowered SBP and MAP (p = 0.013 and 0.026, respectively). The pre-to-post differences in skin conductance and SBP reactivity were statistically significant for the biofeedback group (p = 0.005 and 0.01, respectively), but not for the control group. For the sample as a whole and for the biofeedback group, the state anxiety score and body weight remained unchanged. Conclusions: BP biofeedback exerts a specific treatment effect in reducing BP in individuals with mild hypertension, possibly through reducing pressor reactivity to stress.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)547-554
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine
Volume13
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2007

Fingerprint

Blood Pressure
Hypertension
Pressure
Biofeedback (Psychology)
Arterial Pressure
Anxiety
Body Weight
Skin
Skin Temperature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Complementary and alternative medicine
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

@article{7001d0c733ce44ad840eee14f6f99661,
title = "Blood pressure biofeedback exerts intermediate-term effects on blood pressure and pressure reactivity in individuals with mild hypertension: A randomized controlled study",
abstract = "Objective: This randomized controlled study examined whether a 4-week blood pressure (BP) biofeedback program can reduce BP and BP reactivity to stress in participants with mild hypertension. Methods: Participants in the active biofeedback group (n = 20) were trained in 4 weekly laboratory sessions to self-regulate their BP with continuous BP feedback signals, whereas participants in the sham biofeedback group (n = 18) were told to manipulate their BP without feedback signals. BP, skin temperature, skin conductance, BP reactivity to stress, body weight, and state anxiety were assessed before training and repeated at the eighth week after the training. Results: The decreases in systolic (12.6 ± 8.8 versus 4.1 ± 5.7) and mean BP (8.2 ± 6.9 versus 3.3 ± 4.9) from baseline at week 12 follow-up were significantly greater in the active biofeedback group compared with the sham biofeedback group (p = 0.001 and 0.017, respectively). Results from analysis of covariance with the follow-up systolic blood pressure (SBP) (or mean arterial pressure [MAP]) as the dependent variable, baseline SBP (or MAP) as the covariate, and group as the independent variable showed that biofeedback training effectively lowered SBP and MAP (p = 0.013 and 0.026, respectively). The pre-to-post differences in skin conductance and SBP reactivity were statistically significant for the biofeedback group (p = 0.005 and 0.01, respectively), but not for the control group. For the sample as a whole and for the biofeedback group, the state anxiety score and body weight remained unchanged. Conclusions: BP biofeedback exerts a specific treatment effect in reducing BP in individuals with mild hypertension, possibly through reducing pressor reactivity to stress.",
author = "Pei-Shan Tsai and Nen-Chung Chang and Wen-Yin Chang and Pi-Hsia Lee and Wang, {Mei Yeh}",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1089/acm.2007.6289",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "547--554",
journal = "Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine",
issn = "1075-5535",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Blood pressure biofeedback exerts intermediate-term effects on blood pressure and pressure reactivity in individuals with mild hypertension

T2 - A randomized controlled study

AU - Tsai, Pei-Shan

AU - Chang, Nen-Chung

AU - Chang, Wen-Yin

AU - Lee, Pi-Hsia

AU - Wang, Mei Yeh

PY - 2007/6

Y1 - 2007/6

N2 - Objective: This randomized controlled study examined whether a 4-week blood pressure (BP) biofeedback program can reduce BP and BP reactivity to stress in participants with mild hypertension. Methods: Participants in the active biofeedback group (n = 20) were trained in 4 weekly laboratory sessions to self-regulate their BP with continuous BP feedback signals, whereas participants in the sham biofeedback group (n = 18) were told to manipulate their BP without feedback signals. BP, skin temperature, skin conductance, BP reactivity to stress, body weight, and state anxiety were assessed before training and repeated at the eighth week after the training. Results: The decreases in systolic (12.6 ± 8.8 versus 4.1 ± 5.7) and mean BP (8.2 ± 6.9 versus 3.3 ± 4.9) from baseline at week 12 follow-up were significantly greater in the active biofeedback group compared with the sham biofeedback group (p = 0.001 and 0.017, respectively). Results from analysis of covariance with the follow-up systolic blood pressure (SBP) (or mean arterial pressure [MAP]) as the dependent variable, baseline SBP (or MAP) as the covariate, and group as the independent variable showed that biofeedback training effectively lowered SBP and MAP (p = 0.013 and 0.026, respectively). The pre-to-post differences in skin conductance and SBP reactivity were statistically significant for the biofeedback group (p = 0.005 and 0.01, respectively), but not for the control group. For the sample as a whole and for the biofeedback group, the state anxiety score and body weight remained unchanged. Conclusions: BP biofeedback exerts a specific treatment effect in reducing BP in individuals with mild hypertension, possibly through reducing pressor reactivity to stress.

AB - Objective: This randomized controlled study examined whether a 4-week blood pressure (BP) biofeedback program can reduce BP and BP reactivity to stress in participants with mild hypertension. Methods: Participants in the active biofeedback group (n = 20) were trained in 4 weekly laboratory sessions to self-regulate their BP with continuous BP feedback signals, whereas participants in the sham biofeedback group (n = 18) were told to manipulate their BP without feedback signals. BP, skin temperature, skin conductance, BP reactivity to stress, body weight, and state anxiety were assessed before training and repeated at the eighth week after the training. Results: The decreases in systolic (12.6 ± 8.8 versus 4.1 ± 5.7) and mean BP (8.2 ± 6.9 versus 3.3 ± 4.9) from baseline at week 12 follow-up were significantly greater in the active biofeedback group compared with the sham biofeedback group (p = 0.001 and 0.017, respectively). Results from analysis of covariance with the follow-up systolic blood pressure (SBP) (or mean arterial pressure [MAP]) as the dependent variable, baseline SBP (or MAP) as the covariate, and group as the independent variable showed that biofeedback training effectively lowered SBP and MAP (p = 0.013 and 0.026, respectively). The pre-to-post differences in skin conductance and SBP reactivity were statistically significant for the biofeedback group (p = 0.005 and 0.01, respectively), but not for the control group. For the sample as a whole and for the biofeedback group, the state anxiety score and body weight remained unchanged. Conclusions: BP biofeedback exerts a specific treatment effect in reducing BP in individuals with mild hypertension, possibly through reducing pressor reactivity to stress.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34347336386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34347336386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/acm.2007.6289

DO - 10.1089/acm.2007.6289

M3 - Article

C2 - 17604559

AN - SCOPUS:34347336386

VL - 13

SP - 547

EP - 554

JO - Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine

JF - Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine

SN - 1075-5535

IS - 5

ER -