Basic level categorization and shape processing — an fMRI study

Markus Graf, Christoph David Dahl, Michael Erb, Wolfgang Grodd, Heinrich H. Buelthoff

Research output: Contribution to journalMeeting Abstract

Abstract

How is basic level categorization achieved in the human brain? Behavioral studies showed that categorization performance depends systematically on the amount of morph transformation (e.g. Graf, 2002). These results may be due to time-consuming compensation processes (deformable template matching). If deforming (i.e. spatial) compensation processes are involved, then categorization might not only comprise the ventral visual pathway, as generally assumed, but also the dorsal stream. Objects from 25 common basic level categories were generated by morphing between two category members (using 3ds max). In the categorization task, subjects had to decide as fast as possible whether two sequentially presented objects belonged to the same category. The morph distance between category members was varied (event-related design). In a second task, the same observers perceived intact morphing sequences, scrambled sequences, and static presentations of different morphs (block design). In the categorization task, response latencies increased with increasing morph distance between exemplars. Correspondingly, the BOLD signal increased with increasing morph distance in the lateral occipital complex, the superior parietal and the frontal cortices. Control analyses showed that this pattern of activation cannot be reduced to task difficulty, or increasing shape dissimilarity. In the second task we found parietal activation for the contrast between intact vs. scrambled morphing sequences which was close to the dorsal activation in the categorization task, but not identical. The results suggest that basic level categorization relies on a network of ventral, dorsal and frontal areas. The activation within this network depends systematically on the amount of shape transformation. The dorsal activation seems related to compensation processes in parietal cortex, i.e. spatial (deforming) transformation processes. These findings are in accordance with an alignment approach of categorization.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)511-511
Number of pages1
JournalJournal of Vision
Volume4
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Parietal Lobe
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Visual Pathways
Frontal Lobe
Reaction Time
Brain

Cite this

Basic level categorization and shape processing — an fMRI study. / Graf, Markus; Dahl, Christoph David; Erb, Michael; Grodd, Wolfgang; Buelthoff, Heinrich H.

In: Journal of Vision, Vol. 4, No. 8, 08.2004, p. 511-511.

Research output: Contribution to journalMeeting Abstract

Graf, M, Dahl, CD, Erb, M, Grodd, W & Buelthoff, HH 2004, 'Basic level categorization and shape processing — an fMRI study', Journal of Vision, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 511-511. https://doi.org/10.1167/4.8.511
Graf, Markus ; Dahl, Christoph David ; Erb, Michael ; Grodd, Wolfgang ; Buelthoff, Heinrich H. / Basic level categorization and shape processing — an fMRI study. In: Journal of Vision. 2004 ; Vol. 4, No. 8. pp. 511-511.
@article{f0c5f272f2a54beabfec6cb130bd7fe3,
title = "Basic level categorization and shape processing — an fMRI study",
abstract = "How is basic level categorization achieved in the human brain? Behavioral studies showed that categorization performance depends systematically on the amount of morph transformation (e.g. Graf, 2002). These results may be due to time-consuming compensation processes (deformable template matching). If deforming (i.e. spatial) compensation processes are involved, then categorization might not only comprise the ventral visual pathway, as generally assumed, but also the dorsal stream. Objects from 25 common basic level categories were generated by morphing between two category members (using 3ds max). In the categorization task, subjects had to decide as fast as possible whether two sequentially presented objects belonged to the same category. The morph distance between category members was varied (event-related design). In a second task, the same observers perceived intact morphing sequences, scrambled sequences, and static presentations of different morphs (block design). In the categorization task, response latencies increased with increasing morph distance between exemplars. Correspondingly, the BOLD signal increased with increasing morph distance in the lateral occipital complex, the superior parietal and the frontal cortices. Control analyses showed that this pattern of activation cannot be reduced to task difficulty, or increasing shape dissimilarity. In the second task we found parietal activation for the contrast between intact vs. scrambled morphing sequences which was close to the dorsal activation in the categorization task, but not identical. The results suggest that basic level categorization relies on a network of ventral, dorsal and frontal areas. The activation within this network depends systematically on the amount of shape transformation. The dorsal activation seems related to compensation processes in parietal cortex, i.e. spatial (deforming) transformation processes. These findings are in accordance with an alignment approach of categorization.",
author = "Markus Graf and Dahl, {Christoph David} and Michael Erb and Wolfgang Grodd and Buelthoff, {Heinrich H.}",
year = "2004",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1167/4.8.511",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "511--511",
journal = "Journal of Vision",
issn = "1534-7362",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Basic level categorization and shape processing — an fMRI study

AU - Graf, Markus

AU - Dahl, Christoph David

AU - Erb, Michael

AU - Grodd, Wolfgang

AU - Buelthoff, Heinrich H.

PY - 2004/8

Y1 - 2004/8

N2 - How is basic level categorization achieved in the human brain? Behavioral studies showed that categorization performance depends systematically on the amount of morph transformation (e.g. Graf, 2002). These results may be due to time-consuming compensation processes (deformable template matching). If deforming (i.e. spatial) compensation processes are involved, then categorization might not only comprise the ventral visual pathway, as generally assumed, but also the dorsal stream. Objects from 25 common basic level categories were generated by morphing between two category members (using 3ds max). In the categorization task, subjects had to decide as fast as possible whether two sequentially presented objects belonged to the same category. The morph distance between category members was varied (event-related design). In a second task, the same observers perceived intact morphing sequences, scrambled sequences, and static presentations of different morphs (block design). In the categorization task, response latencies increased with increasing morph distance between exemplars. Correspondingly, the BOLD signal increased with increasing morph distance in the lateral occipital complex, the superior parietal and the frontal cortices. Control analyses showed that this pattern of activation cannot be reduced to task difficulty, or increasing shape dissimilarity. In the second task we found parietal activation for the contrast between intact vs. scrambled morphing sequences which was close to the dorsal activation in the categorization task, but not identical. The results suggest that basic level categorization relies on a network of ventral, dorsal and frontal areas. The activation within this network depends systematically on the amount of shape transformation. The dorsal activation seems related to compensation processes in parietal cortex, i.e. spatial (deforming) transformation processes. These findings are in accordance with an alignment approach of categorization.

AB - How is basic level categorization achieved in the human brain? Behavioral studies showed that categorization performance depends systematically on the amount of morph transformation (e.g. Graf, 2002). These results may be due to time-consuming compensation processes (deformable template matching). If deforming (i.e. spatial) compensation processes are involved, then categorization might not only comprise the ventral visual pathway, as generally assumed, but also the dorsal stream. Objects from 25 common basic level categories were generated by morphing between two category members (using 3ds max). In the categorization task, subjects had to decide as fast as possible whether two sequentially presented objects belonged to the same category. The morph distance between category members was varied (event-related design). In a second task, the same observers perceived intact morphing sequences, scrambled sequences, and static presentations of different morphs (block design). In the categorization task, response latencies increased with increasing morph distance between exemplars. Correspondingly, the BOLD signal increased with increasing morph distance in the lateral occipital complex, the superior parietal and the frontal cortices. Control analyses showed that this pattern of activation cannot be reduced to task difficulty, or increasing shape dissimilarity. In the second task we found parietal activation for the contrast between intact vs. scrambled morphing sequences which was close to the dorsal activation in the categorization task, but not identical. The results suggest that basic level categorization relies on a network of ventral, dorsal and frontal areas. The activation within this network depends systematically on the amount of shape transformation. The dorsal activation seems related to compensation processes in parietal cortex, i.e. spatial (deforming) transformation processes. These findings are in accordance with an alignment approach of categorization.

U2 - 10.1167/4.8.511

DO - 10.1167/4.8.511

M3 - Meeting Abstract

VL - 4

SP - 511

EP - 511

JO - Journal of Vision

JF - Journal of Vision

SN - 1534-7362

IS - 8

ER -