Autologous blood injection for treatment of lateral epicondylosis

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Lin Chuan Chou, Tsan-Hon Liou, Yi Chun Kuan, Yao Hsien Huang, Hung-Chou Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To appraise existing evidence of autologous blood injection in treating lateral epicondylosis. Design: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Setting: A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Cochrane, SCOPUS, and CINAHL databases was performed to identify randomized controlled trials that reported the efficacy of autologous blood injection in treating lateral epicondylosis. The selected studies were subjected to a meta-analysis and risk of bias assessment. Participants: Patients with lateral epicondylosis. Main Outcome Measures: Pain-related measurement in each selected randomized controlled trial was pooled into meta-analysis. Results: Nine randomized controlled trials were included in the analysis. The results of the meta-analysis including the pain scores indicated that autologous blood injection is more effective compared with corticosteroid injection (standard mean difference: -0.75; 95% confidence interval: -1.14 to -0.37) but not more effective compared with platelet-rich plasma injection (standard mean difference: 0.09; 95% confidence interval: -0.66 to 0.84). The risk of bias assessment indicated that all the included trials exhibited a moderate to high risk of bias. Conclusion: Autologous blood injection is more effective than corticosteroid injection but not more effective than platelet-rich plasma injection in treating lateral epicondylosis. However, this evidence is limited by the potential risk of bias.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)68-73
Number of pages6
JournalPhysical Therapy in Sport
Volume18
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Randomized Controlled Trials
Injections
Platelet-Rich Plasma
Therapeutics
Adrenal Cortex Hormones
Confidence Intervals
Pain Measurement
PubMed
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Databases
Pain

Keywords

  • Autologous blood injection
  • Lateral epicondylosis
  • Meta-analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Autologous blood injection for treatment of lateral epicondylosis : A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. / Chou, Lin Chuan; Liou, Tsan-Hon; Kuan, Yi Chun; Huang, Yao Hsien; Chen, Hung-Chou.

In: Physical Therapy in Sport, Vol. 18, 01.03.2016, p. 68-73.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fd3af831c05d43d88141ff35c0eab0d0,
title = "Autologous blood injection for treatment of lateral epicondylosis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials",
abstract = "Objectives: To appraise existing evidence of autologous blood injection in treating lateral epicondylosis. Design: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Setting: A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Cochrane, SCOPUS, and CINAHL databases was performed to identify randomized controlled trials that reported the efficacy of autologous blood injection in treating lateral epicondylosis. The selected studies were subjected to a meta-analysis and risk of bias assessment. Participants: Patients with lateral epicondylosis. Main Outcome Measures: Pain-related measurement in each selected randomized controlled trial was pooled into meta-analysis. Results: Nine randomized controlled trials were included in the analysis. The results of the meta-analysis including the pain scores indicated that autologous blood injection is more effective compared with corticosteroid injection (standard mean difference: -0.75; 95{\%} confidence interval: -1.14 to -0.37) but not more effective compared with platelet-rich plasma injection (standard mean difference: 0.09; 95{\%} confidence interval: -0.66 to 0.84). The risk of bias assessment indicated that all the included trials exhibited a moderate to high risk of bias. Conclusion: Autologous blood injection is more effective than corticosteroid injection but not more effective than platelet-rich plasma injection in treating lateral epicondylosis. However, this evidence is limited by the potential risk of bias.",
keywords = "Autologous blood injection, Lateral epicondylosis, Meta-analysis",
author = "Chou, {Lin Chuan} and Tsan-Hon Liou and Kuan, {Yi Chun} and Huang, {Yao Hsien} and Hung-Chou Chen",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ptsp.2015.06.002",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "68--73",
journal = "Physical Therapy in Sport",
issn = "1873-1600",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Autologous blood injection for treatment of lateral epicondylosis

T2 - A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AU - Chou, Lin Chuan

AU - Liou, Tsan-Hon

AU - Kuan, Yi Chun

AU - Huang, Yao Hsien

AU - Chen, Hung-Chou

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Objectives: To appraise existing evidence of autologous blood injection in treating lateral epicondylosis. Design: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Setting: A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Cochrane, SCOPUS, and CINAHL databases was performed to identify randomized controlled trials that reported the efficacy of autologous blood injection in treating lateral epicondylosis. The selected studies were subjected to a meta-analysis and risk of bias assessment. Participants: Patients with lateral epicondylosis. Main Outcome Measures: Pain-related measurement in each selected randomized controlled trial was pooled into meta-analysis. Results: Nine randomized controlled trials were included in the analysis. The results of the meta-analysis including the pain scores indicated that autologous blood injection is more effective compared with corticosteroid injection (standard mean difference: -0.75; 95% confidence interval: -1.14 to -0.37) but not more effective compared with platelet-rich plasma injection (standard mean difference: 0.09; 95% confidence interval: -0.66 to 0.84). The risk of bias assessment indicated that all the included trials exhibited a moderate to high risk of bias. Conclusion: Autologous blood injection is more effective than corticosteroid injection but not more effective than platelet-rich plasma injection in treating lateral epicondylosis. However, this evidence is limited by the potential risk of bias.

AB - Objectives: To appraise existing evidence of autologous blood injection in treating lateral epicondylosis. Design: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Setting: A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Cochrane, SCOPUS, and CINAHL databases was performed to identify randomized controlled trials that reported the efficacy of autologous blood injection in treating lateral epicondylosis. The selected studies were subjected to a meta-analysis and risk of bias assessment. Participants: Patients with lateral epicondylosis. Main Outcome Measures: Pain-related measurement in each selected randomized controlled trial was pooled into meta-analysis. Results: Nine randomized controlled trials were included in the analysis. The results of the meta-analysis including the pain scores indicated that autologous blood injection is more effective compared with corticosteroid injection (standard mean difference: -0.75; 95% confidence interval: -1.14 to -0.37) but not more effective compared with platelet-rich plasma injection (standard mean difference: 0.09; 95% confidence interval: -0.66 to 0.84). The risk of bias assessment indicated that all the included trials exhibited a moderate to high risk of bias. Conclusion: Autologous blood injection is more effective than corticosteroid injection but not more effective than platelet-rich plasma injection in treating lateral epicondylosis. However, this evidence is limited by the potential risk of bias.

KW - Autologous blood injection

KW - Lateral epicondylosis

KW - Meta-analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959325685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959325685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ptsp.2015.06.002

DO - 10.1016/j.ptsp.2015.06.002

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 68

EP - 73

JO - Physical Therapy in Sport

JF - Physical Therapy in Sport

SN - 1873-1600

ER -