Attitudes toward human rights: Modal and Individual Personalities in Taiwan

Jeffrey J. Guo, Meei-ying Kao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The issue of human rights has gained attention in Taiwan, and this study represents a breakthrough regarding the use of an interdisciplinary research approach that includes a psychological focus. We utilized multiscale questionnaires to test the attitudes toward human rights from different perspectives. The results showed that the following: (1) The modal personalities of Taiwan, namely the authoritarian and dogmatic personalities, are not conducive to the development of human rights; (2) civil liberalism and globalism are good for the development of individual personalities, while patriotism and nationalism are not entirely bad, but support civil constraint; and (3) individuals in favor of civil liberalism are in the minority and face more difficulty in adapting to the Taiwanese environment. Our recommendation is that leaders who are strong in civil liberalism must be elected to encourage a culture of "obedience" and "disparate layout" for the development of human rights in Taiwan.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)337-358
Number of pages22
JournalAfrican and Asian Studies
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Individual, Personality
human rights
liberalism
Taiwan
personality
dogmatics
obedience
patriotism
interdisciplinary research
nationalism
research approach
layout
minority
leader
Human Rights
questionnaire
Liberalism

Keywords

  • attitudes toward human rights
  • civil liberalism
  • culture of obedience and disparate layout
  • macro and micro personalities
  • Taiwan human rights questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Development
  • History

Cite this

Attitudes toward human rights : Modal and Individual Personalities in Taiwan. / Guo, Jeffrey J.; Kao, Meei-ying.

In: African and Asian Studies, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2015, p. 337-358.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2e12d968cd7c456a90baa58a6bfa88e1,
title = "Attitudes toward human rights: Modal and Individual Personalities in Taiwan",
abstract = "The issue of human rights has gained attention in Taiwan, and this study represents a breakthrough regarding the use of an interdisciplinary research approach that includes a psychological focus. We utilized multiscale questionnaires to test the attitudes toward human rights from different perspectives. The results showed that the following: (1) The modal personalities of Taiwan, namely the authoritarian and dogmatic personalities, are not conducive to the development of human rights; (2) civil liberalism and globalism are good for the development of individual personalities, while patriotism and nationalism are not entirely bad, but support civil constraint; and (3) individuals in favor of civil liberalism are in the minority and face more difficulty in adapting to the Taiwanese environment. Our recommendation is that leaders who are strong in civil liberalism must be elected to encourage a culture of {"}obedience{"} and {"}disparate layout{"} for the development of human rights in Taiwan.",
keywords = "attitudes toward human rights, civil liberalism, culture of obedience and disparate layout, macro and micro personalities, Taiwan human rights questionnaires",
author = "Guo, {Jeffrey J.} and Meei-ying Kao",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1163/15692108-12341348",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "337--358",
journal = "African and Asian Studies",
issn = "1569-2094",
publisher = "Brill",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attitudes toward human rights

T2 - Modal and Individual Personalities in Taiwan

AU - Guo, Jeffrey J.

AU - Kao, Meei-ying

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The issue of human rights has gained attention in Taiwan, and this study represents a breakthrough regarding the use of an interdisciplinary research approach that includes a psychological focus. We utilized multiscale questionnaires to test the attitudes toward human rights from different perspectives. The results showed that the following: (1) The modal personalities of Taiwan, namely the authoritarian and dogmatic personalities, are not conducive to the development of human rights; (2) civil liberalism and globalism are good for the development of individual personalities, while patriotism and nationalism are not entirely bad, but support civil constraint; and (3) individuals in favor of civil liberalism are in the minority and face more difficulty in adapting to the Taiwanese environment. Our recommendation is that leaders who are strong in civil liberalism must be elected to encourage a culture of "obedience" and "disparate layout" for the development of human rights in Taiwan.

AB - The issue of human rights has gained attention in Taiwan, and this study represents a breakthrough regarding the use of an interdisciplinary research approach that includes a psychological focus. We utilized multiscale questionnaires to test the attitudes toward human rights from different perspectives. The results showed that the following: (1) The modal personalities of Taiwan, namely the authoritarian and dogmatic personalities, are not conducive to the development of human rights; (2) civil liberalism and globalism are good for the development of individual personalities, while patriotism and nationalism are not entirely bad, but support civil constraint; and (3) individuals in favor of civil liberalism are in the minority and face more difficulty in adapting to the Taiwanese environment. Our recommendation is that leaders who are strong in civil liberalism must be elected to encourage a culture of "obedience" and "disparate layout" for the development of human rights in Taiwan.

KW - attitudes toward human rights

KW - civil liberalism

KW - culture of obedience and disparate layout

KW - macro and micro personalities

KW - Taiwan human rights questionnaires

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953733974&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953733974&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1163/15692108-12341348

DO - 10.1163/15692108-12341348

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84953733974

VL - 14

SP - 337

EP - 358

JO - African and Asian Studies

JF - African and Asian Studies

SN - 1569-2094

IS - 4

ER -