Association Between Surgeon and Hospital Volume and In-Hospital Fatalities After Lung Cancer Resections: The Experience of an Asian Country

Yung Chang Lien, Ming Te Huang, Herng Ching Lin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: We used 4-year nationwide population-based data to explore the volume-outcome relationships for lung cancer resections in Taiwan and to determine whether there is any association between high-volume hospitals or high-volume surgeons and lower in-hospital mortality rates. Methods: We use pooled data for the years 2001 through 2004 obtained from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. A total of 4,841 patients, identified as having undergone pulmonary resections for lung or bronchial tumors during the period of this study, were treated by 377 surgeons in 79 hospitals. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were then employed to assess the crude and adjusted odds ratio of in-patient fatalities between surgeon and hospital lung cancer resection volume groups. Results: Patients treated by low-volume surgeons had significantly higher in-hospital fatality rates than those treated by either medium-volume surgeons (2.3% versus 1.0%; p <0.001) or high-volume surgeons (2.3% versus 0.6%; p <0.001). However, hospital case volume alone is not a significant predictor of hospital in-patient fatalities for lung cancer resections. With increasing surgeon volume, there was a decline in the adjusted odds ratio of hospital in-patient deaths. The odds of hospital in-patient deaths for those patients treated by low-volume surgeons were 2.04 times those of medium-volume surgeons, and 2.63 times those of high-volume surgeons. Conclusions: We conclude that after adjusting for patient, surgeon, and hospital characteristics, an inverse volume-outcome relationship does exist for surgeons, but not for hospitals, in Taiwan.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1837-1843
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of Thoracic Surgery
Volume83
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2007

Fingerprint

Lung Neoplasms
Taiwan
Surgeons
High-Volume Hospitals
Odds Ratio
Lung
National Health Programs
Hospital Mortality
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis
Databases
Mortality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

@article{497d505d96b64e3597c309bef4b598c9,
title = "Association Between Surgeon and Hospital Volume and In-Hospital Fatalities After Lung Cancer Resections: The Experience of an Asian Country",
abstract = "Background: We used 4-year nationwide population-based data to explore the volume-outcome relationships for lung cancer resections in Taiwan and to determine whether there is any association between high-volume hospitals or high-volume surgeons and lower in-hospital mortality rates. Methods: We use pooled data for the years 2001 through 2004 obtained from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. A total of 4,841 patients, identified as having undergone pulmonary resections for lung or bronchial tumors during the period of this study, were treated by 377 surgeons in 79 hospitals. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were then employed to assess the crude and adjusted odds ratio of in-patient fatalities between surgeon and hospital lung cancer resection volume groups. Results: Patients treated by low-volume surgeons had significantly higher in-hospital fatality rates than those treated by either medium-volume surgeons (2.3{\%} versus 1.0{\%}; p <0.001) or high-volume surgeons (2.3{\%} versus 0.6{\%}; p <0.001). However, hospital case volume alone is not a significant predictor of hospital in-patient fatalities for lung cancer resections. With increasing surgeon volume, there was a decline in the adjusted odds ratio of hospital in-patient deaths. The odds of hospital in-patient deaths for those patients treated by low-volume surgeons were 2.04 times those of medium-volume surgeons, and 2.63 times those of high-volume surgeons. Conclusions: We conclude that after adjusting for patient, surgeon, and hospital characteristics, an inverse volume-outcome relationship does exist for surgeons, but not for hospitals, in Taiwan.",
author = "Lien, {Yung Chang} and Huang, {Ming Te} and Lin, {Herng Ching}",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.12.008",
language = "English",
volume = "83",
pages = "1837--1843",
journal = "Annals of Thoracic Surgery",
issn = "0003-4975",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Association Between Surgeon and Hospital Volume and In-Hospital Fatalities After Lung Cancer Resections

T2 - The Experience of an Asian Country

AU - Lien, Yung Chang

AU - Huang, Ming Te

AU - Lin, Herng Ching

PY - 2007/5

Y1 - 2007/5

N2 - Background: We used 4-year nationwide population-based data to explore the volume-outcome relationships for lung cancer resections in Taiwan and to determine whether there is any association between high-volume hospitals or high-volume surgeons and lower in-hospital mortality rates. Methods: We use pooled data for the years 2001 through 2004 obtained from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. A total of 4,841 patients, identified as having undergone pulmonary resections for lung or bronchial tumors during the period of this study, were treated by 377 surgeons in 79 hospitals. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were then employed to assess the crude and adjusted odds ratio of in-patient fatalities between surgeon and hospital lung cancer resection volume groups. Results: Patients treated by low-volume surgeons had significantly higher in-hospital fatality rates than those treated by either medium-volume surgeons (2.3% versus 1.0%; p <0.001) or high-volume surgeons (2.3% versus 0.6%; p <0.001). However, hospital case volume alone is not a significant predictor of hospital in-patient fatalities for lung cancer resections. With increasing surgeon volume, there was a decline in the adjusted odds ratio of hospital in-patient deaths. The odds of hospital in-patient deaths for those patients treated by low-volume surgeons were 2.04 times those of medium-volume surgeons, and 2.63 times those of high-volume surgeons. Conclusions: We conclude that after adjusting for patient, surgeon, and hospital characteristics, an inverse volume-outcome relationship does exist for surgeons, but not for hospitals, in Taiwan.

AB - Background: We used 4-year nationwide population-based data to explore the volume-outcome relationships for lung cancer resections in Taiwan and to determine whether there is any association between high-volume hospitals or high-volume surgeons and lower in-hospital mortality rates. Methods: We use pooled data for the years 2001 through 2004 obtained from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. A total of 4,841 patients, identified as having undergone pulmonary resections for lung or bronchial tumors during the period of this study, were treated by 377 surgeons in 79 hospitals. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were then employed to assess the crude and adjusted odds ratio of in-patient fatalities between surgeon and hospital lung cancer resection volume groups. Results: Patients treated by low-volume surgeons had significantly higher in-hospital fatality rates than those treated by either medium-volume surgeons (2.3% versus 1.0%; p <0.001) or high-volume surgeons (2.3% versus 0.6%; p <0.001). However, hospital case volume alone is not a significant predictor of hospital in-patient fatalities for lung cancer resections. With increasing surgeon volume, there was a decline in the adjusted odds ratio of hospital in-patient deaths. The odds of hospital in-patient deaths for those patients treated by low-volume surgeons were 2.04 times those of medium-volume surgeons, and 2.63 times those of high-volume surgeons. Conclusions: We conclude that after adjusting for patient, surgeon, and hospital characteristics, an inverse volume-outcome relationship does exist for surgeons, but not for hospitals, in Taiwan.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247194606&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34247194606&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.12.008

DO - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.12.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 17462409

AN - SCOPUS:34247194606

VL - 83

SP - 1837

EP - 1843

JO - Annals of Thoracic Surgery

JF - Annals of Thoracic Surgery

SN - 0003-4975

IS - 5

ER -