Assessment of radiation safety in cardiac CT angiography

Yuan Hao Lee, Po Yen Chang, Shee Yen Tay, Cheng Yu Tsai, Po Hsin Cheng, Wilson T. Lao, Wing P. Chan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study investigates the radiation dose and image quality of patients not receiving β-blockers for cardiac CT angiography (CCTA) with or without the optimization of electrocardiographic (ECG) pulsing window. The differences in patient characteristics are also characterized. Normal-weight and obese patients (n=154) with heart rates between 65 and 80 beats per minutes (bpm) during the prospective axial scanning were enrolled retrospectively. The ECG pulsing windows were set at 50% to 75% (Group A) or 60% to 75% (Group B) of the R-R interval for patients with heart rate variability higher than or not exceeding ±5bpm, respectively. The effective doses of individual patient were estimated from the dose length product of the CCTA scan. Two radiologists independently reviewed the images and applied a 4-point Likert scale for image quality assessment. The patients' characteristics were compared along with the patients' effective doses between groups. The optimized pulsing window significantly reduced the average radiation dose for normal-weight and obese patients by 33% and 27%, respectively. The CCTA image quality of patients in Group A was not different overall from those obtained from Group B. Nondiabetic obese patients were more likely to be accepted for the use of the optimized pulsing window. Unlike obese patients, normal-weight patients revealed no characteristic difference between Groups A and B. This study indicates an equivalent efficacy of using optimized pulsing windows for reducing the radiation dose for patients without β-blocker administration between different body weight groups. Nevertheless, gender and diabetic status became prominent characteristics in the obese group when matching up with the optimized pulsing window.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere9305
JournalMedicine (United States)
Volume96
Issue number51
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 2017

Fingerprint

Radiation
Safety
Weights and Measures
Computed Tomography Angiography
Heart Rate
Body Weight

Keywords

  • cardiac computed tomography angiography
  • image quality
  • obese patients
  • patient safety
  • radiation dose

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Assessment of radiation safety in cardiac CT angiography. / Lee, Yuan Hao; Chang, Po Yen; Tay, Shee Yen; Tsai, Cheng Yu; Cheng, Po Hsin; Lao, Wilson T.; Chan, Wing P.

In: Medicine (United States), Vol. 96, No. 51, e9305, 01.12.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, Yuan Hao ; Chang, Po Yen ; Tay, Shee Yen ; Tsai, Cheng Yu ; Cheng, Po Hsin ; Lao, Wilson T. ; Chan, Wing P. / Assessment of radiation safety in cardiac CT angiography. In: Medicine (United States). 2017 ; Vol. 96, No. 51.
@article{20644d24c2b14feea349e3e9a2595254,
title = "Assessment of radiation safety in cardiac CT angiography",
abstract = "This study investigates the radiation dose and image quality of patients not receiving β-blockers for cardiac CT angiography (CCTA) with or without the optimization of electrocardiographic (ECG) pulsing window. The differences in patient characteristics are also characterized. Normal-weight and obese patients (n=154) with heart rates between 65 and 80 beats per minutes (bpm) during the prospective axial scanning were enrolled retrospectively. The ECG pulsing windows were set at 50{\%} to 75{\%} (Group A) or 60{\%} to 75{\%} (Group B) of the R-R interval for patients with heart rate variability higher than or not exceeding ±5bpm, respectively. The effective doses of individual patient were estimated from the dose length product of the CCTA scan. Two radiologists independently reviewed the images and applied a 4-point Likert scale for image quality assessment. The patients' characteristics were compared along with the patients' effective doses between groups. The optimized pulsing window significantly reduced the average radiation dose for normal-weight and obese patients by 33{\%} and 27{\%}, respectively. The CCTA image quality of patients in Group A was not different overall from those obtained from Group B. Nondiabetic obese patients were more likely to be accepted for the use of the optimized pulsing window. Unlike obese patients, normal-weight patients revealed no characteristic difference between Groups A and B. This study indicates an equivalent efficacy of using optimized pulsing windows for reducing the radiation dose for patients without β-blocker administration between different body weight groups. Nevertheless, gender and diabetic status became prominent characteristics in the obese group when matching up with the optimized pulsing window.",
keywords = "cardiac computed tomography angiography, image quality, obese patients, patient safety, radiation dose",
author = "Lee, {Yuan Hao} and Chang, {Po Yen} and Tay, {Shee Yen} and Tsai, {Cheng Yu} and Cheng, {Po Hsin} and Lao, {Wilson T.} and Chan, {Wing P.}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/MD.0000000000009305",
language = "English",
volume = "96",
journal = "Medicine; analytical reviews of general medicine, neurology, psychiatry, dermatology, and pediatries",
issn = "0025-7974",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "51",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of radiation safety in cardiac CT angiography

AU - Lee, Yuan Hao

AU - Chang, Po Yen

AU - Tay, Shee Yen

AU - Tsai, Cheng Yu

AU - Cheng, Po Hsin

AU - Lao, Wilson T.

AU - Chan, Wing P.

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - This study investigates the radiation dose and image quality of patients not receiving β-blockers for cardiac CT angiography (CCTA) with or without the optimization of electrocardiographic (ECG) pulsing window. The differences in patient characteristics are also characterized. Normal-weight and obese patients (n=154) with heart rates between 65 and 80 beats per minutes (bpm) during the prospective axial scanning were enrolled retrospectively. The ECG pulsing windows were set at 50% to 75% (Group A) or 60% to 75% (Group B) of the R-R interval for patients with heart rate variability higher than or not exceeding ±5bpm, respectively. The effective doses of individual patient were estimated from the dose length product of the CCTA scan. Two radiologists independently reviewed the images and applied a 4-point Likert scale for image quality assessment. The patients' characteristics were compared along with the patients' effective doses between groups. The optimized pulsing window significantly reduced the average radiation dose for normal-weight and obese patients by 33% and 27%, respectively. The CCTA image quality of patients in Group A was not different overall from those obtained from Group B. Nondiabetic obese patients were more likely to be accepted for the use of the optimized pulsing window. Unlike obese patients, normal-weight patients revealed no characteristic difference between Groups A and B. This study indicates an equivalent efficacy of using optimized pulsing windows for reducing the radiation dose for patients without β-blocker administration between different body weight groups. Nevertheless, gender and diabetic status became prominent characteristics in the obese group when matching up with the optimized pulsing window.

AB - This study investigates the radiation dose and image quality of patients not receiving β-blockers for cardiac CT angiography (CCTA) with or without the optimization of electrocardiographic (ECG) pulsing window. The differences in patient characteristics are also characterized. Normal-weight and obese patients (n=154) with heart rates between 65 and 80 beats per minutes (bpm) during the prospective axial scanning were enrolled retrospectively. The ECG pulsing windows were set at 50% to 75% (Group A) or 60% to 75% (Group B) of the R-R interval for patients with heart rate variability higher than or not exceeding ±5bpm, respectively. The effective doses of individual patient were estimated from the dose length product of the CCTA scan. Two radiologists independently reviewed the images and applied a 4-point Likert scale for image quality assessment. The patients' characteristics were compared along with the patients' effective doses between groups. The optimized pulsing window significantly reduced the average radiation dose for normal-weight and obese patients by 33% and 27%, respectively. The CCTA image quality of patients in Group A was not different overall from those obtained from Group B. Nondiabetic obese patients were more likely to be accepted for the use of the optimized pulsing window. Unlike obese patients, normal-weight patients revealed no characteristic difference between Groups A and B. This study indicates an equivalent efficacy of using optimized pulsing windows for reducing the radiation dose for patients without β-blocker administration between different body weight groups. Nevertheless, gender and diabetic status became prominent characteristics in the obese group when matching up with the optimized pulsing window.

KW - cardiac computed tomography angiography

KW - image quality

KW - obese patients

KW - patient safety

KW - radiation dose

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039722528&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85039722528&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MD.0000000000009305

DO - 10.1097/MD.0000000000009305

M3 - Article

C2 - 29390498

AN - SCOPUS:85039722528

VL - 96

JO - Medicine; analytical reviews of general medicine, neurology, psychiatry, dermatology, and pediatries

JF - Medicine; analytical reviews of general medicine, neurology, psychiatry, dermatology, and pediatries

SN - 0025-7974

IS - 51

M1 - e9305

ER -