Assessment of GPs' beliefs relating to the care of people with intellectual disabilities: A Taiwan-based, opportunity-guided approach

Jin Ding Lin, Shang Wei Hsu, Ying Ting Chou, Chia Feng Yen, Jia Ling Wu, Cordia Chu, Ching Hui Loh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose. This study was designed to investigate general practitioners' (GPs) beliefs about the perceived importance of their role in, and their satisfaction with, providing healthcare to people with intellectual disabilities. The identification of healthcare issues with potential for improvement was assessed using gap analysis and an opportunity-guided method. Method. A cross-sectional census survey by a mail-structured questionnaire recruited 331 GPs (response rate = 16%) who provided information on healthcare for people with intellectual disabilities in 2006 in Taiwan. Results. The results indicated that GPs considered their role in providing healthcare for people with intellectual disabilities to be important (mean score 7.2 - 8.3). However, the respondents generally did not feel satisfied (mean score 4.6 - 5.5) with their achievements in treating patients with intellectual disabilities. We found that the gender and educational level of the respondents were statistically correlated to the perceived importance they considered their work to have, while the factors of age, medical practice setting and training experience in intellectual disability were statistically correlated to GPs' perceived satisfaction in providing healthcare to people with intellectual disabilities (p < 0.05). Those healthcare issues of 'training and experience in intellectual disability', 'multi-disciplinary and multi-sectoral cooperation', 'adequate competence in disability diagnosis', 'genetic consulting services', 'duty of disease prevention and health promotion', and 'adequate medical consultation time' were the five most promising areas to be improved in healthcare for people with intellectual disabilities according to the opportunity-guided analysis. Conclusions. This study highlights that health professionals need to examine carefully healthcare issues pertaining to people with ID, and that much more effort is required to develop appropriate healthcare policies based on the opportunity-guided health issues identified here.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)611-617
Number of pages7
JournalDisability and Rehabilitation
Volume30
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 4 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Disabled Persons
Taiwan
Intellectual Disability
General Practitioners
Delivery of Health Care
Genetic Services
Age Factors
Health
Postal Service
Censuses
Health Promotion
Mental Competency
Referral and Consultation
Cross-Sectional Studies

Keywords

  • Belief
  • GP
  • Healthcare
  • Intellectual disability
  • Opportunity-guided approach

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Assessment of GPs' beliefs relating to the care of people with intellectual disabilities : A Taiwan-based, opportunity-guided approach. / Lin, Jin Ding; Hsu, Shang Wei; Chou, Ying Ting; Yen, Chia Feng; Wu, Jia Ling; Chu, Cordia; Loh, Ching Hui.

In: Disability and Rehabilitation, Vol. 30, No. 8, 04.09.2008, p. 611-617.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lin, Jin Ding ; Hsu, Shang Wei ; Chou, Ying Ting ; Yen, Chia Feng ; Wu, Jia Ling ; Chu, Cordia ; Loh, Ching Hui. / Assessment of GPs' beliefs relating to the care of people with intellectual disabilities : A Taiwan-based, opportunity-guided approach. In: Disability and Rehabilitation. 2008 ; Vol. 30, No. 8. pp. 611-617.
@article{996a126dd28d47c09117c5f359cd34f8,
title = "Assessment of GPs' beliefs relating to the care of people with intellectual disabilities: A Taiwan-based, opportunity-guided approach",
abstract = "Purpose. This study was designed to investigate general practitioners' (GPs) beliefs about the perceived importance of their role in, and their satisfaction with, providing healthcare to people with intellectual disabilities. The identification of healthcare issues with potential for improvement was assessed using gap analysis and an opportunity-guided method. Method. A cross-sectional census survey by a mail-structured questionnaire recruited 331 GPs (response rate = 16{\%}) who provided information on healthcare for people with intellectual disabilities in 2006 in Taiwan. Results. The results indicated that GPs considered their role in providing healthcare for people with intellectual disabilities to be important (mean score 7.2 - 8.3). However, the respondents generally did not feel satisfied (mean score 4.6 - 5.5) with their achievements in treating patients with intellectual disabilities. We found that the gender and educational level of the respondents were statistically correlated to the perceived importance they considered their work to have, while the factors of age, medical practice setting and training experience in intellectual disability were statistically correlated to GPs' perceived satisfaction in providing healthcare to people with intellectual disabilities (p < 0.05). Those healthcare issues of 'training and experience in intellectual disability', 'multi-disciplinary and multi-sectoral cooperation', 'adequate competence in disability diagnosis', 'genetic consulting services', 'duty of disease prevention and health promotion', and 'adequate medical consultation time' were the five most promising areas to be improved in healthcare for people with intellectual disabilities according to the opportunity-guided analysis. Conclusions. This study highlights that health professionals need to examine carefully healthcare issues pertaining to people with ID, and that much more effort is required to develop appropriate healthcare policies based on the opportunity-guided health issues identified here.",
keywords = "Belief, GP, Healthcare, Intellectual disability, Opportunity-guided approach",
author = "Lin, {Jin Ding} and Hsu, {Shang Wei} and Chou, {Ying Ting} and Yen, {Chia Feng} and Wu, {Jia Ling} and Cordia Chu and Loh, {Ching Hui}",
year = "2008",
month = "9",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/09638280701476078",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "611--617",
journal = "Disability and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0963-8288",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of GPs' beliefs relating to the care of people with intellectual disabilities

T2 - A Taiwan-based, opportunity-guided approach

AU - Lin, Jin Ding

AU - Hsu, Shang Wei

AU - Chou, Ying Ting

AU - Yen, Chia Feng

AU - Wu, Jia Ling

AU - Chu, Cordia

AU - Loh, Ching Hui

PY - 2008/9/4

Y1 - 2008/9/4

N2 - Purpose. This study was designed to investigate general practitioners' (GPs) beliefs about the perceived importance of their role in, and their satisfaction with, providing healthcare to people with intellectual disabilities. The identification of healthcare issues with potential for improvement was assessed using gap analysis and an opportunity-guided method. Method. A cross-sectional census survey by a mail-structured questionnaire recruited 331 GPs (response rate = 16%) who provided information on healthcare for people with intellectual disabilities in 2006 in Taiwan. Results. The results indicated that GPs considered their role in providing healthcare for people with intellectual disabilities to be important (mean score 7.2 - 8.3). However, the respondents generally did not feel satisfied (mean score 4.6 - 5.5) with their achievements in treating patients with intellectual disabilities. We found that the gender and educational level of the respondents were statistically correlated to the perceived importance they considered their work to have, while the factors of age, medical practice setting and training experience in intellectual disability were statistically correlated to GPs' perceived satisfaction in providing healthcare to people with intellectual disabilities (p < 0.05). Those healthcare issues of 'training and experience in intellectual disability', 'multi-disciplinary and multi-sectoral cooperation', 'adequate competence in disability diagnosis', 'genetic consulting services', 'duty of disease prevention and health promotion', and 'adequate medical consultation time' were the five most promising areas to be improved in healthcare for people with intellectual disabilities according to the opportunity-guided analysis. Conclusions. This study highlights that health professionals need to examine carefully healthcare issues pertaining to people with ID, and that much more effort is required to develop appropriate healthcare policies based on the opportunity-guided health issues identified here.

AB - Purpose. This study was designed to investigate general practitioners' (GPs) beliefs about the perceived importance of their role in, and their satisfaction with, providing healthcare to people with intellectual disabilities. The identification of healthcare issues with potential for improvement was assessed using gap analysis and an opportunity-guided method. Method. A cross-sectional census survey by a mail-structured questionnaire recruited 331 GPs (response rate = 16%) who provided information on healthcare for people with intellectual disabilities in 2006 in Taiwan. Results. The results indicated that GPs considered their role in providing healthcare for people with intellectual disabilities to be important (mean score 7.2 - 8.3). However, the respondents generally did not feel satisfied (mean score 4.6 - 5.5) with their achievements in treating patients with intellectual disabilities. We found that the gender and educational level of the respondents were statistically correlated to the perceived importance they considered their work to have, while the factors of age, medical practice setting and training experience in intellectual disability were statistically correlated to GPs' perceived satisfaction in providing healthcare to people with intellectual disabilities (p < 0.05). Those healthcare issues of 'training and experience in intellectual disability', 'multi-disciplinary and multi-sectoral cooperation', 'adequate competence in disability diagnosis', 'genetic consulting services', 'duty of disease prevention and health promotion', and 'adequate medical consultation time' were the five most promising areas to be improved in healthcare for people with intellectual disabilities according to the opportunity-guided analysis. Conclusions. This study highlights that health professionals need to examine carefully healthcare issues pertaining to people with ID, and that much more effort is required to develop appropriate healthcare policies based on the opportunity-guided health issues identified here.

KW - Belief

KW - GP

KW - Healthcare

KW - Intellectual disability

KW - Opportunity-guided approach

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=50549102075&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=50549102075&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09638280701476078

DO - 10.1080/09638280701476078

M3 - Article

C2 - 17852278

AN - SCOPUS:50549102075

VL - 30

SP - 611

EP - 617

JO - Disability and Rehabilitation

JF - Disability and Rehabilitation

SN - 0963-8288

IS - 8

ER -