22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: In a single arthroscopic surgery for rotator cuff tears with a stiff shoulder, closed manipulation with or without arthroscopic capsular release has been combined with the repair. Few studies have reported functional results after this surgery, and a clinical comparison has not been reported. Purpose: To compare functional outcomes with and without capsular release in arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff tears with a stiff shoulder. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Among patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs with a concomitant stiff shoulder, 34 patients were treated with either manipulation and arthroscopic capsular release (group A; n = 18) or manipulation without capsular release (group B; n = 16). Preoperative mean passive forward flexion was 118° in group A and 117° in group B, whereas external rotation at the side was 28° and 29°, respectively. All patients were evaluated at a minimum 2-year follow-up in terms of visual analog scale for pain, muscle power, range of motion, Constant score, modified American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder evaluation form, and modified University of alifornia at Los Angeles (UCLA) scores. Results: The mean modified ASES score was 90.3 for group A and 87.7 for group B (P = .086). The mean UCLA scores were 34.3 and 33.0, respectively (P = .247). The 2 groups showed a significant difference in forward flexion and external rotation postoperatively, as group B recovered more slowly. There was no difference in the mean visual analog scale for pain at the last follow-up, but a 13° difference in forward flexion (P

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2121-2127
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume40
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2012

Fingerprint

Joint Capsule Release
Pain Measurement
Elbow
Therapeutics
Rotator Cuff
Los Angeles
Arthroscopy
Articular Range of Motion
Rotator Cuff Injuries
Cohort Studies
Muscles

Keywords

  • adhesive capsulitis
  • arthroscopic surgery
  • rotator cuff repair
  • stiff shoulder

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{fa3bd7d2a9f84618a8286dcd361af0cb,
title = "Arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff tears with shoulder stiffness: A comparison of functional outcomes with and without capsular release",
abstract = "Background: In a single arthroscopic surgery for rotator cuff tears with a stiff shoulder, closed manipulation with or without arthroscopic capsular release has been combined with the repair. Few studies have reported functional results after this surgery, and a clinical comparison has not been reported. Purpose: To compare functional outcomes with and without capsular release in arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff tears with a stiff shoulder. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Among patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs with a concomitant stiff shoulder, 34 patients were treated with either manipulation and arthroscopic capsular release (group A; n = 18) or manipulation without capsular release (group B; n = 16). Preoperative mean passive forward flexion was 118° in group A and 117° in group B, whereas external rotation at the side was 28° and 29°, respectively. All patients were evaluated at a minimum 2-year follow-up in terms of visual analog scale for pain, muscle power, range of motion, Constant score, modified American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder evaluation form, and modified University of alifornia at Los Angeles (UCLA) scores. Results: The mean modified ASES score was 90.3 for group A and 87.7 for group B (P = .086). The mean UCLA scores were 34.3 and 33.0, respectively (P = .247). The 2 groups showed a significant difference in forward flexion and external rotation postoperatively, as group B recovered more slowly. There was no difference in the mean visual analog scale for pain at the last follow-up, but a 13° difference in forward flexion (P",
keywords = "adhesive capsulitis, arthroscopic surgery, rotator cuff repair, stiff shoulder",
author = "Chuang, {Tai Yuan} and Ho, {Wei Pin} and Chen, {Chih Hwa} and Lee, {Chian Her} and Liau, {Jiann Jong} and Huang, {Chang Hung}",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1177/0363546512453296",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "2121--2127",
journal = "American Journal of Sports Medicine",
issn = "0363-5465",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff tears with shoulder stiffness

T2 - A comparison of functional outcomes with and without capsular release

AU - Chuang, Tai Yuan

AU - Ho, Wei Pin

AU - Chen, Chih Hwa

AU - Lee, Chian Her

AU - Liau, Jiann Jong

AU - Huang, Chang Hung

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - Background: In a single arthroscopic surgery for rotator cuff tears with a stiff shoulder, closed manipulation with or without arthroscopic capsular release has been combined with the repair. Few studies have reported functional results after this surgery, and a clinical comparison has not been reported. Purpose: To compare functional outcomes with and without capsular release in arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff tears with a stiff shoulder. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Among patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs with a concomitant stiff shoulder, 34 patients were treated with either manipulation and arthroscopic capsular release (group A; n = 18) or manipulation without capsular release (group B; n = 16). Preoperative mean passive forward flexion was 118° in group A and 117° in group B, whereas external rotation at the side was 28° and 29°, respectively. All patients were evaluated at a minimum 2-year follow-up in terms of visual analog scale for pain, muscle power, range of motion, Constant score, modified American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder evaluation form, and modified University of alifornia at Los Angeles (UCLA) scores. Results: The mean modified ASES score was 90.3 for group A and 87.7 for group B (P = .086). The mean UCLA scores were 34.3 and 33.0, respectively (P = .247). The 2 groups showed a significant difference in forward flexion and external rotation postoperatively, as group B recovered more slowly. There was no difference in the mean visual analog scale for pain at the last follow-up, but a 13° difference in forward flexion (P

AB - Background: In a single arthroscopic surgery for rotator cuff tears with a stiff shoulder, closed manipulation with or without arthroscopic capsular release has been combined with the repair. Few studies have reported functional results after this surgery, and a clinical comparison has not been reported. Purpose: To compare functional outcomes with and without capsular release in arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff tears with a stiff shoulder. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Among patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs with a concomitant stiff shoulder, 34 patients were treated with either manipulation and arthroscopic capsular release (group A; n = 18) or manipulation without capsular release (group B; n = 16). Preoperative mean passive forward flexion was 118° in group A and 117° in group B, whereas external rotation at the side was 28° and 29°, respectively. All patients were evaluated at a minimum 2-year follow-up in terms of visual analog scale for pain, muscle power, range of motion, Constant score, modified American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder evaluation form, and modified University of alifornia at Los Angeles (UCLA) scores. Results: The mean modified ASES score was 90.3 for group A and 87.7 for group B (P = .086). The mean UCLA scores were 34.3 and 33.0, respectively (P = .247). The 2 groups showed a significant difference in forward flexion and external rotation postoperatively, as group B recovered more slowly. There was no difference in the mean visual analog scale for pain at the last follow-up, but a 13° difference in forward flexion (P

KW - adhesive capsulitis

KW - arthroscopic surgery

KW - rotator cuff repair

KW - stiff shoulder

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866007762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866007762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0363546512453296

DO - 10.1177/0363546512453296

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 2121

EP - 2127

JO - American Journal of Sports Medicine

JF - American Journal of Sports Medicine

SN - 0363-5465

IS - 9

ER -