Are major medical centers better for stroke and myocardial infarction patients in Taiwan? A nationwide population-based study

To-Chi Ha, Wai Mau Choi, Ray E. Chang, Chu Hui Chang, Mei Chueh Yang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Stroke and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are serious diseases for elderly patients in Taiwan. For better outcomes, we prepared guidelines for the transfer of these patients to major medical centers. However, there has been no evidence-based research conducted in Taiwan focusing on the mortality rate of elderly AMI and stroke patients in different levels of hospital. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the outcomes for elderly stroke and AMI patients in different levels of hospitals. Methods From the original claim data of 1 million beneficiaries enrolled in 2007, all hospitalized patients older than 50 years with the primary diagnosis of AMI, hemorrhagic stroke, or ischemic stroke (ICD-9-CM code 410, 430-432, or 433-438) were identified from the database. In 2007, 338 AMI cases, 293 hemorrhagic stroke cases, and 1,290 ischemic stroke cases were included in our study. Patients who were transferred between hospitals were excluded. All the possible risk factors such as patient age, sex, triage classification, preexisting comorbidities, and different hospital levels were adjusted for in a logistic regression model. Results In ischemic stroke patients, the odds ratio of mortality for the patients in major medical centers was 0.4 times that for patients in regional hospitals. Thus, major medical centers were safer for ischemic stroke patients after adjusting for patient age, sex, triage classifications and preexisting comorbidities. However, differences in the survival rates of hemorrhagic stroke patients between hospitals were insignificant. In AMI patients, the survival rates were also not significantly different after adjusting for age, sex, triage classification, preexisting comorbidities and hospital level. Conclusions Our study showed that major medical centers were safer only for ischemic stroke patients after adjusting for patient age, sex, triage classifications and preexisting comorbidities. This finding suggests that all patients with acute onset stroke should be sent to major medical centers for further evaluation and treatment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)137-142
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Gerontology
Volume4
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2010

Fingerprint

Taiwan
Stroke
Myocardial Infarction
Population
Triage
Comorbidity
Survival Rate
Logistic Models
Patient Transfer
Mortality
International Classification of Diseases

Keywords

  • epidemiology
  • evidence-based medicine
  • myocardial infarction
  • patient care
  • stroke

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

Are major medical centers better for stroke and myocardial infarction patients in Taiwan? A nationwide population-based study. / Ha, To-Chi; Choi, Wai Mau; Chang, Ray E.; Chang, Chu Hui; Yang, Mei Chueh.

In: International Journal of Gerontology, Vol. 4, No. 3, 09.2010, p. 137-142.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ha, To-Chi ; Choi, Wai Mau ; Chang, Ray E. ; Chang, Chu Hui ; Yang, Mei Chueh. / Are major medical centers better for stroke and myocardial infarction patients in Taiwan? A nationwide population-based study. In: International Journal of Gerontology. 2010 ; Vol. 4, No. 3. pp. 137-142.
@article{3e791ebebd1c48989a2fbccd9fae54c3,
title = "Are major medical centers better for stroke and myocardial infarction patients in Taiwan? A nationwide population-based study",
abstract = "Background Stroke and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are serious diseases for elderly patients in Taiwan. For better outcomes, we prepared guidelines for the transfer of these patients to major medical centers. However, there has been no evidence-based research conducted in Taiwan focusing on the mortality rate of elderly AMI and stroke patients in different levels of hospital. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the outcomes for elderly stroke and AMI patients in different levels of hospitals. Methods From the original claim data of 1 million beneficiaries enrolled in 2007, all hospitalized patients older than 50 years with the primary diagnosis of AMI, hemorrhagic stroke, or ischemic stroke (ICD-9-CM code 410, 430-432, or 433-438) were identified from the database. In 2007, 338 AMI cases, 293 hemorrhagic stroke cases, and 1,290 ischemic stroke cases were included in our study. Patients who were transferred between hospitals were excluded. All the possible risk factors such as patient age, sex, triage classification, preexisting comorbidities, and different hospital levels were adjusted for in a logistic regression model. Results In ischemic stroke patients, the odds ratio of mortality for the patients in major medical centers was 0.4 times that for patients in regional hospitals. Thus, major medical centers were safer for ischemic stroke patients after adjusting for patient age, sex, triage classifications and preexisting comorbidities. However, differences in the survival rates of hemorrhagic stroke patients between hospitals were insignificant. In AMI patients, the survival rates were also not significantly different after adjusting for age, sex, triage classification, preexisting comorbidities and hospital level. Conclusions Our study showed that major medical centers were safer only for ischemic stroke patients after adjusting for patient age, sex, triage classifications and preexisting comorbidities. This finding suggests that all patients with acute onset stroke should be sent to major medical centers for further evaluation and treatment.",
keywords = "epidemiology, evidence-based medicine, myocardial infarction, patient care, stroke",
author = "To-Chi Ha and Choi, {Wai Mau} and Chang, {Ray E.} and Chang, {Chu Hui} and Yang, {Mei Chueh}",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/S1873-9598(10)70037-5",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "137--142",
journal = "International Journal of Gerontology",
issn = "1873-9598",
publisher = "Elsevier Taiwan LLC",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are major medical centers better for stroke and myocardial infarction patients in Taiwan? A nationwide population-based study

AU - Ha, To-Chi

AU - Choi, Wai Mau

AU - Chang, Ray E.

AU - Chang, Chu Hui

AU - Yang, Mei Chueh

PY - 2010/9

Y1 - 2010/9

N2 - Background Stroke and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are serious diseases for elderly patients in Taiwan. For better outcomes, we prepared guidelines for the transfer of these patients to major medical centers. However, there has been no evidence-based research conducted in Taiwan focusing on the mortality rate of elderly AMI and stroke patients in different levels of hospital. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the outcomes for elderly stroke and AMI patients in different levels of hospitals. Methods From the original claim data of 1 million beneficiaries enrolled in 2007, all hospitalized patients older than 50 years with the primary diagnosis of AMI, hemorrhagic stroke, or ischemic stroke (ICD-9-CM code 410, 430-432, or 433-438) were identified from the database. In 2007, 338 AMI cases, 293 hemorrhagic stroke cases, and 1,290 ischemic stroke cases were included in our study. Patients who were transferred between hospitals were excluded. All the possible risk factors such as patient age, sex, triage classification, preexisting comorbidities, and different hospital levels were adjusted for in a logistic regression model. Results In ischemic stroke patients, the odds ratio of mortality for the patients in major medical centers was 0.4 times that for patients in regional hospitals. Thus, major medical centers were safer for ischemic stroke patients after adjusting for patient age, sex, triage classifications and preexisting comorbidities. However, differences in the survival rates of hemorrhagic stroke patients between hospitals were insignificant. In AMI patients, the survival rates were also not significantly different after adjusting for age, sex, triage classification, preexisting comorbidities and hospital level. Conclusions Our study showed that major medical centers were safer only for ischemic stroke patients after adjusting for patient age, sex, triage classifications and preexisting comorbidities. This finding suggests that all patients with acute onset stroke should be sent to major medical centers for further evaluation and treatment.

AB - Background Stroke and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are serious diseases for elderly patients in Taiwan. For better outcomes, we prepared guidelines for the transfer of these patients to major medical centers. However, there has been no evidence-based research conducted in Taiwan focusing on the mortality rate of elderly AMI and stroke patients in different levels of hospital. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the outcomes for elderly stroke and AMI patients in different levels of hospitals. Methods From the original claim data of 1 million beneficiaries enrolled in 2007, all hospitalized patients older than 50 years with the primary diagnosis of AMI, hemorrhagic stroke, or ischemic stroke (ICD-9-CM code 410, 430-432, or 433-438) were identified from the database. In 2007, 338 AMI cases, 293 hemorrhagic stroke cases, and 1,290 ischemic stroke cases were included in our study. Patients who were transferred between hospitals were excluded. All the possible risk factors such as patient age, sex, triage classification, preexisting comorbidities, and different hospital levels were adjusted for in a logistic regression model. Results In ischemic stroke patients, the odds ratio of mortality for the patients in major medical centers was 0.4 times that for patients in regional hospitals. Thus, major medical centers were safer for ischemic stroke patients after adjusting for patient age, sex, triage classifications and preexisting comorbidities. However, differences in the survival rates of hemorrhagic stroke patients between hospitals were insignificant. In AMI patients, the survival rates were also not significantly different after adjusting for age, sex, triage classification, preexisting comorbidities and hospital level. Conclusions Our study showed that major medical centers were safer only for ischemic stroke patients after adjusting for patient age, sex, triage classifications and preexisting comorbidities. This finding suggests that all patients with acute onset stroke should be sent to major medical centers for further evaluation and treatment.

KW - epidemiology

KW - evidence-based medicine

KW - myocardial infarction

KW - patient care

KW - stroke

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957586813&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957586813&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1873-9598(10)70037-5

DO - 10.1016/S1873-9598(10)70037-5

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77957586813

VL - 4

SP - 137

EP - 142

JO - International Journal of Gerontology

JF - International Journal of Gerontology

SN - 1873-9598

IS - 3

ER -