適應、實現或對話?

儒家傳統對現代性衝擊回應方式的考察

Translated title of the contribution: Adaptation, Realization or Dialogue?: A Study on the Response Methods of Confucian Tradition towards the Modern Impact

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This essay looks back upon the history of interaction between Confucian tradition and modernity over the last one hundred years, in hopes of finding one inte ractive path between Confucian tradition and modernity through introspection and critique. The phenomenon of “ Modernity ” which has secured a stunning victory and legal standing in modern Chinese intellectual community exactly embodies the result of expandi ng “ modernity ” globally. On the basis of stance of Confucian tradition, the issue of concern over the la st one hundred years is that “ will it give rise to the debates if Confucianism is still essential in modern time” or “ will it be only suitable for schol ars ’ research in history or history of philosophy” in face of the impact from modernity . In thus context, there are three response methods in Chinese intellectual community over the past one hundred years: The May Fourth Movement, an anti -traditional movem ent , was the first one proposed in early years in the Republic of China , as the second one was embodied in a variety of “ adaptation hypotheses” amid which the prime part consisted in “Creative transformation,” and the third one featured the “ realization th eory ” of new -Confucianism. The common issues amid these schemes consist in carrying out personal viewpoints or simply an embodiment of self presentation , rather than delivering the dialogue that can hardly give interpretation properly. This essay thus prop oses a view: A real dialogue lies in that both parties “ combine jointly as a new common body ” in delivering the dialogue, as there should be one interactive path between Confucianism tradition and modernity that consists in the expectations over the genera tion of such common body.
Original languageTraditional Chinese
Pages (from-to)1-26
Journal通識教育與跨域研究
Volume6
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Confucian
Modernity
Confucianism
History
May Fourth Movement
Introspection
Stance
Embodiment
Interaction
Props
Self-presentation
Taiwan
Modern Times
Victory
History of philosophy

Keywords

  • confucian tradition
  • Modernity
  • conservatism
  • May Fourth movement
  • creative transformation

Cite this

適應、實現或對話? : 儒家傳統對現代性衝擊回應方式的考察. / 張錫輝.

In: 通識教育與跨域研究, Vol. 6, 01.06.2009, p. 1-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{054fe28d96f44d699a31dbfdfe203076,
title = "適應、實現或對話?: 儒家傳統對現代性衝擊回應方式的考察",
abstract = "本文回溯了百年來儒家傳統與現代性交往的歷史,從反省批判中,希望找出一條儒家傳統與現代性之間應有的交往之道?「現代性」在近代中國思想界取得全面地勝利與合法地位的現象,正是「現代性」往全球擴張的結果。從儒家傳統的立場著眼,百年來最關心的問題,即是面對現代性的衝擊,儒學在當代是否仍有其必要,或者只宜作為過往之歷史或哲學史以供學者研究?對此,百年來的中國知識界有三種回應方式:第一是在民國初年最先被提出的方案----五四的「反傳統主義」。第二種方案是各種各樣的「適應說」,而種種「適應說」當中,最首要的就是「創造性轉化」。第三種方案則是新儒家的「實現說」。這些方案的共同問題,在於只是一味地貫徹執行自己的觀點或是單純的自我表現,而不是在進行對話,因而也無法允當地進行詮釋。本文主張,真正的對話是對話的雙方「彼此結合成一個新的共同體」,儒家傳統與現代性之間應有的交往之道,應該在於期待這樣的一個共同體的產生。",
keywords = "儒家傳統, 現代性, 保守主義, 五四運動, 創造性轉化, confucian tradition, Modernity, conservatism, May Fourth movement, creative transformation",
author = "張錫輝",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "繁體中文",
volume = "6",
pages = "1--26",
journal = "通識教育與跨域研究",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 適應、實現或對話?

T2 - 儒家傳統對現代性衝擊回應方式的考察

AU - 張錫輝, null

PY - 2009/6/1

Y1 - 2009/6/1

N2 - 本文回溯了百年來儒家傳統與現代性交往的歷史,從反省批判中,希望找出一條儒家傳統與現代性之間應有的交往之道?「現代性」在近代中國思想界取得全面地勝利與合法地位的現象,正是「現代性」往全球擴張的結果。從儒家傳統的立場著眼,百年來最關心的問題,即是面對現代性的衝擊,儒學在當代是否仍有其必要,或者只宜作為過往之歷史或哲學史以供學者研究?對此,百年來的中國知識界有三種回應方式:第一是在民國初年最先被提出的方案----五四的「反傳統主義」。第二種方案是各種各樣的「適應說」,而種種「適應說」當中,最首要的就是「創造性轉化」。第三種方案則是新儒家的「實現說」。這些方案的共同問題,在於只是一味地貫徹執行自己的觀點或是單純的自我表現,而不是在進行對話,因而也無法允當地進行詮釋。本文主張,真正的對話是對話的雙方「彼此結合成一個新的共同體」,儒家傳統與現代性之間應有的交往之道,應該在於期待這樣的一個共同體的產生。

AB - 本文回溯了百年來儒家傳統與現代性交往的歷史,從反省批判中,希望找出一條儒家傳統與現代性之間應有的交往之道?「現代性」在近代中國思想界取得全面地勝利與合法地位的現象,正是「現代性」往全球擴張的結果。從儒家傳統的立場著眼,百年來最關心的問題,即是面對現代性的衝擊,儒學在當代是否仍有其必要,或者只宜作為過往之歷史或哲學史以供學者研究?對此,百年來的中國知識界有三種回應方式:第一是在民國初年最先被提出的方案----五四的「反傳統主義」。第二種方案是各種各樣的「適應說」,而種種「適應說」當中,最首要的就是「創造性轉化」。第三種方案則是新儒家的「實現說」。這些方案的共同問題,在於只是一味地貫徹執行自己的觀點或是單純的自我表現,而不是在進行對話,因而也無法允當地進行詮釋。本文主張,真正的對話是對話的雙方「彼此結合成一個新的共同體」,儒家傳統與現代性之間應有的交往之道,應該在於期待這樣的一個共同體的產生。

KW - 儒家傳統

KW - 現代性

KW - 保守主義

KW - 五四運動

KW - 創造性轉化

KW - confucian tradition

KW - Modernity

KW - conservatism

KW - May Fourth movement

KW - creative transformation

UR - http://libibmap.nhu.edu.tw/citesys/jnPaperDetail.aspx?pID=1529

M3 - 文章

VL - 6

SP - 1

EP - 26

JO - 通識教育與跨域研究

JF - 通識教育與跨域研究

ER -