Accuracy of Corneal Astigmatism Estimation by Neglecting the Posterior Corneal Surface Measurement

Jau D. Ho, Ching Y. Tsai, Shiow W. Liou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

83 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of corneal astigmatism estimation by neglecting the posterior corneal surface measurement. Design: Prospective, observational study. Methods: The right eyes of 493 subjects were measured with a rotating Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam; Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). The keratometric corneal astigmatism (KA) was obtained by using the anterior corneal surface measurement and the keratometric index (1.3375) while neglecting the posterior corneal surface measurement. The Pentacam-derived total corneal astigmatism (PA) was derived by doubled-angle vector analysis of the astigmatisms on both corneal surfaces. Results: The mean arithmetic and absolute estimation errors of the KA magnitude for the PA magnitude were -0.06 ± 0.28 diopters (D) (range, -0.59 to 0.91 D) and 0.24 ± 0.16 D (range, 0 to 0.91 D), respectively. The mean arithmetic and absolute estimation errors of the KA angle for the PA angle were -0.6 degrees ± 12.7 degrees (range, -69.9 degrees to 83.4 degrees) and 7.4 degrees ± 10.3 degrees (range, 0 degrees to 83.4 degrees), respectively. Among all eyes, 142 eyes (28.8%) had either a KA magnitude that differed by > 0.50 D from the PA magnitude or a KA angle that differed by > 10 degrees from the PA angle. For the 282 eyes with a KA magnitude exceeding 1.0 D (that are candidates for intraoperative correction of a preexisting astigmatism during cataract surgery), 29 eyes (10.3%) had either a KA magnitude that differed by > 0.50 D from the PA magnitude or a KA angle that differed by > 10 degrees from the PA angle. Conclusions: Neglecting the posterior corneal surface measurement may lead to significant deviation in the corneal astigmatism estimation in a proportion of eyes.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume147
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2009

Fingerprint

Astigmatism
Cataract
Observational Studies
Germany
Prospective Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Accuracy of Corneal Astigmatism Estimation by Neglecting the Posterior Corneal Surface Measurement. / Ho, Jau D.; Tsai, Ching Y.; Liou, Shiow W.

In: American Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 147, No. 5, 05.2009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{180bcdae193248ffb4b6e41b46f958b6,
title = "Accuracy of Corneal Astigmatism Estimation by Neglecting the Posterior Corneal Surface Measurement",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of corneal astigmatism estimation by neglecting the posterior corneal surface measurement. Design: Prospective, observational study. Methods: The right eyes of 493 subjects were measured with a rotating Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam; Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). The keratometric corneal astigmatism (KA) was obtained by using the anterior corneal surface measurement and the keratometric index (1.3375) while neglecting the posterior corneal surface measurement. The Pentacam-derived total corneal astigmatism (PA) was derived by doubled-angle vector analysis of the astigmatisms on both corneal surfaces. Results: The mean arithmetic and absolute estimation errors of the KA magnitude for the PA magnitude were -0.06 ± 0.28 diopters (D) (range, -0.59 to 0.91 D) and 0.24 ± 0.16 D (range, 0 to 0.91 D), respectively. The mean arithmetic and absolute estimation errors of the KA angle for the PA angle were -0.6 degrees ± 12.7 degrees (range, -69.9 degrees to 83.4 degrees) and 7.4 degrees ± 10.3 degrees (range, 0 degrees to 83.4 degrees), respectively. Among all eyes, 142 eyes (28.8{\%}) had either a KA magnitude that differed by > 0.50 D from the PA magnitude or a KA angle that differed by > 10 degrees from the PA angle. For the 282 eyes with a KA magnitude exceeding 1.0 D (that are candidates for intraoperative correction of a preexisting astigmatism during cataract surgery), 29 eyes (10.3{\%}) had either a KA magnitude that differed by > 0.50 D from the PA magnitude or a KA angle that differed by > 10 degrees from the PA angle. Conclusions: Neglecting the posterior corneal surface measurement may lead to significant deviation in the corneal astigmatism estimation in a proportion of eyes.",
author = "Ho, {Jau D.} and Tsai, {Ching Y.} and Liou, {Shiow W.}",
year = "2009",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajo.2008.12.020",
language = "English",
volume = "147",
journal = "American Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0002-9394",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of Corneal Astigmatism Estimation by Neglecting the Posterior Corneal Surface Measurement

AU - Ho, Jau D.

AU - Tsai, Ching Y.

AU - Liou, Shiow W.

PY - 2009/5

Y1 - 2009/5

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of corneal astigmatism estimation by neglecting the posterior corneal surface measurement. Design: Prospective, observational study. Methods: The right eyes of 493 subjects were measured with a rotating Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam; Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). The keratometric corneal astigmatism (KA) was obtained by using the anterior corneal surface measurement and the keratometric index (1.3375) while neglecting the posterior corneal surface measurement. The Pentacam-derived total corneal astigmatism (PA) was derived by doubled-angle vector analysis of the astigmatisms on both corneal surfaces. Results: The mean arithmetic and absolute estimation errors of the KA magnitude for the PA magnitude were -0.06 ± 0.28 diopters (D) (range, -0.59 to 0.91 D) and 0.24 ± 0.16 D (range, 0 to 0.91 D), respectively. The mean arithmetic and absolute estimation errors of the KA angle for the PA angle were -0.6 degrees ± 12.7 degrees (range, -69.9 degrees to 83.4 degrees) and 7.4 degrees ± 10.3 degrees (range, 0 degrees to 83.4 degrees), respectively. Among all eyes, 142 eyes (28.8%) had either a KA magnitude that differed by > 0.50 D from the PA magnitude or a KA angle that differed by > 10 degrees from the PA angle. For the 282 eyes with a KA magnitude exceeding 1.0 D (that are candidates for intraoperative correction of a preexisting astigmatism during cataract surgery), 29 eyes (10.3%) had either a KA magnitude that differed by > 0.50 D from the PA magnitude or a KA angle that differed by > 10 degrees from the PA angle. Conclusions: Neglecting the posterior corneal surface measurement may lead to significant deviation in the corneal astigmatism estimation in a proportion of eyes.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of corneal astigmatism estimation by neglecting the posterior corneal surface measurement. Design: Prospective, observational study. Methods: The right eyes of 493 subjects were measured with a rotating Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam; Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). The keratometric corneal astigmatism (KA) was obtained by using the anterior corneal surface measurement and the keratometric index (1.3375) while neglecting the posterior corneal surface measurement. The Pentacam-derived total corneal astigmatism (PA) was derived by doubled-angle vector analysis of the astigmatisms on both corneal surfaces. Results: The mean arithmetic and absolute estimation errors of the KA magnitude for the PA magnitude were -0.06 ± 0.28 diopters (D) (range, -0.59 to 0.91 D) and 0.24 ± 0.16 D (range, 0 to 0.91 D), respectively. The mean arithmetic and absolute estimation errors of the KA angle for the PA angle were -0.6 degrees ± 12.7 degrees (range, -69.9 degrees to 83.4 degrees) and 7.4 degrees ± 10.3 degrees (range, 0 degrees to 83.4 degrees), respectively. Among all eyes, 142 eyes (28.8%) had either a KA magnitude that differed by > 0.50 D from the PA magnitude or a KA angle that differed by > 10 degrees from the PA angle. For the 282 eyes with a KA magnitude exceeding 1.0 D (that are candidates for intraoperative correction of a preexisting astigmatism during cataract surgery), 29 eyes (10.3%) had either a KA magnitude that differed by > 0.50 D from the PA magnitude or a KA angle that differed by > 10 degrees from the PA angle. Conclusions: Neglecting the posterior corneal surface measurement may lead to significant deviation in the corneal astigmatism estimation in a proportion of eyes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=64449088425&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=64449088425&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.12.020

DO - 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.12.020

M3 - Article

VL - 147

JO - American Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - American Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0002-9394

IS - 5

ER -