A Systematic Review of Tests Assessing Stroke Knowledge

Wen-Hsuan Hou, Tammy Hoffmann, Yi Jing Huang, Tzu-Yi Wu, Sheng-Shiung Chen, Ching-Lin Hsieh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND:: Accurate assessment of stroke knowledge (SK) is fundamental to the successful understanding of, monitoring of, and intervening to improve the SK of patients and the public. PURPOSE:: The purpose of this study is to perform a systematic review of the existing SK tests and appraise their conceptual basis, feasibility, and psychometric properties. We conducted 2-step searching of MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus electronic databases from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2014, to identify relevant SK tests for the appraisal. RESULTS:: Our study found 59 SK tests, out of a total of 93 articles, with full content available that had been referred to in the published literature. Ten of them had been used in more than 1 study, and 2 (the Stroke Knowledge Test and the Stroke Action Test) of them have had at least 1 of their psychometric properties validated. Only 1 test (the Stroke Knowledge Test) was developed using rigorous methodology, covers a wide range of concepts, and met all feasibility criteria; however, its limitations include no articulated conceptual basis, inadequate internal consistency reliability (α = .65), and lack of some validated psychometric properties. CONCLUSIONS:: Our study revealed that current available tools are not sufficiently able to accurately and reliably assess SK to promote stroke prevention and management. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS:: This study highlights the attention of applying current SK tests and need for revising existing tests or developing a new test. Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Cardiovascular Nursing
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Stroke
Psychometrics
MEDLINE
Databases
Health

Cite this

A Systematic Review of Tests Assessing Stroke Knowledge. / Hou, Wen-Hsuan; Hoffmann, Tammy; Huang, Yi Jing; Wu, Tzu-Yi; Chen, Sheng-Shiung; Hsieh, Ching-Lin.

In: Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hou, Wen-Hsuan ; Hoffmann, Tammy ; Huang, Yi Jing ; Wu, Tzu-Yi ; Chen, Sheng-Shiung ; Hsieh, Ching-Lin. / A Systematic Review of Tests Assessing Stroke Knowledge. In: Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2016.
@article{94f3f9c755f84c1e8b59ee1e729799bd,
title = "A Systematic Review of Tests Assessing Stroke Knowledge",
abstract = "BACKGROUND:: Accurate assessment of stroke knowledge (SK) is fundamental to the successful understanding of, monitoring of, and intervening to improve the SK of patients and the public. PURPOSE:: The purpose of this study is to perform a systematic review of the existing SK tests and appraise their conceptual basis, feasibility, and psychometric properties. We conducted 2-step searching of MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus electronic databases from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2014, to identify relevant SK tests for the appraisal. RESULTS:: Our study found 59 SK tests, out of a total of 93 articles, with full content available that had been referred to in the published literature. Ten of them had been used in more than 1 study, and 2 (the Stroke Knowledge Test and the Stroke Action Test) of them have had at least 1 of their psychometric properties validated. Only 1 test (the Stroke Knowledge Test) was developed using rigorous methodology, covers a wide range of concepts, and met all feasibility criteria; however, its limitations include no articulated conceptual basis, inadequate internal consistency reliability (α = .65), and lack of some validated psychometric properties. CONCLUSIONS:: Our study revealed that current available tools are not sufficiently able to accurately and reliably assess SK to promote stroke prevention and management. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS:: This study highlights the attention of applying current SK tests and need for revising existing tests or developing a new test. Copyright {\circledC} 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved",
author = "Wen-Hsuan Hou and Tammy Hoffmann and Huang, {Yi Jing} and Tzu-Yi Wu and Sheng-Shiung Chen and Ching-Lin Hsieh",
note = "Export Date: 20 July 2016 Article in Press 通訊地址: Hou, W.-H.",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1097/JCN.0000000000000345",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing",
issn = "0889-4655",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Systematic Review of Tests Assessing Stroke Knowledge

AU - Hou, Wen-Hsuan

AU - Hoffmann, Tammy

AU - Huang, Yi Jing

AU - Wu, Tzu-Yi

AU - Chen, Sheng-Shiung

AU - Hsieh, Ching-Lin

N1 - Export Date: 20 July 2016 Article in Press 通訊地址: Hou, W.-H.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - BACKGROUND:: Accurate assessment of stroke knowledge (SK) is fundamental to the successful understanding of, monitoring of, and intervening to improve the SK of patients and the public. PURPOSE:: The purpose of this study is to perform a systematic review of the existing SK tests and appraise their conceptual basis, feasibility, and psychometric properties. We conducted 2-step searching of MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus electronic databases from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2014, to identify relevant SK tests for the appraisal. RESULTS:: Our study found 59 SK tests, out of a total of 93 articles, with full content available that had been referred to in the published literature. Ten of them had been used in more than 1 study, and 2 (the Stroke Knowledge Test and the Stroke Action Test) of them have had at least 1 of their psychometric properties validated. Only 1 test (the Stroke Knowledge Test) was developed using rigorous methodology, covers a wide range of concepts, and met all feasibility criteria; however, its limitations include no articulated conceptual basis, inadequate internal consistency reliability (α = .65), and lack of some validated psychometric properties. CONCLUSIONS:: Our study revealed that current available tools are not sufficiently able to accurately and reliably assess SK to promote stroke prevention and management. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS:: This study highlights the attention of applying current SK tests and need for revising existing tests or developing a new test. Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved

AB - BACKGROUND:: Accurate assessment of stroke knowledge (SK) is fundamental to the successful understanding of, monitoring of, and intervening to improve the SK of patients and the public. PURPOSE:: The purpose of this study is to perform a systematic review of the existing SK tests and appraise their conceptual basis, feasibility, and psychometric properties. We conducted 2-step searching of MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus electronic databases from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2014, to identify relevant SK tests for the appraisal. RESULTS:: Our study found 59 SK tests, out of a total of 93 articles, with full content available that had been referred to in the published literature. Ten of them had been used in more than 1 study, and 2 (the Stroke Knowledge Test and the Stroke Action Test) of them have had at least 1 of their psychometric properties validated. Only 1 test (the Stroke Knowledge Test) was developed using rigorous methodology, covers a wide range of concepts, and met all feasibility criteria; however, its limitations include no articulated conceptual basis, inadequate internal consistency reliability (α = .65), and lack of some validated psychometric properties. CONCLUSIONS:: Our study revealed that current available tools are not sufficiently able to accurately and reliably assess SK to promote stroke prevention and management. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS:: This study highlights the attention of applying current SK tests and need for revising existing tests or developing a new test. Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved

U2 - 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000345

DO - 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000345

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing

JF - Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing

SN - 0889-4655

ER -