精神衛生護理人員對精神衛生護理師實務能力甄審機制之意見初探

Translated title of the contribution: A study of psychiatric mental health nurses' perspectives of the clinical competence examination and credentialing model

戎瑾如, 蕭淑貞, 黃瑞媛, 劉于新, 謝淑貞, 陳碧霞, 蘇淑芳, 康云瑄, 周桂如

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Nursing clinical competence examinations have become a central professional and corporate issue. The purpose of this study was to explore the objectivity, acceptability, comparability and justice of the psychiatric mental health nurses' clinical competemce examination. The sample of this study was psychiatric nurses who were invited in the seminars of psychiatric clinical examinations standards and strategies. Structured questionnaires were used to collect data, from which 83 subjects' data were collected. The results of this study support that the objectivity, comparability, acceptability, justice of the psychiatric clinical examinations can be effective perform and foster an evidenced-based practice approach to psychiatric clinical care.
Original languageTraditional Chinese
Pages (from-to)48-56
Number of pages9
Journal精神衛生護理雜誌
Volume1
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2006

    Fingerprint

Cite this

戎瑾如, 蕭淑貞, 黃瑞媛, 劉于新, 謝淑貞, 陳碧霞, 蘇淑芳, 康云瑄, & 周桂如 (2006). 精神衛生護理人員對精神衛生護理師實務能力甄審機制之意見初探. 精神衛生護理雜誌, 1(1), 48-56.