A prospective, randomized trial of large-versus small-volume endoscopic injection of epinephrine for peptic ulcer bleeding

Hwai Jeng Lin, Yu Hsi Hsieh, Guan Ying Tseng, Chin Lin Perng, Full Young Chang, Shou Dong Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

107 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic injection of epinephrine in the treatment of bleeding peptic ulcer is considered highly effective, safe, inexpensive, and easy to use. However, bleeding recurs in 6% to 36% of patients. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal dose of epinephrine for endoscopic injection in the treatment of patients with bleeding peptic ulcer. Methods: One hundred fifty-six patients with active bleeding or nonbleeding visible vessels were randomized to receive small- (5-10 mL) or large-volume (13-20 mL) injections of a 1:10,000 solution of epinephrine. Results: The mean volume of epinephrine injected was 16.5 mL (95% CI [15.7, 17.3 mL]) in the large-volume group and 8.0 mL (95% CI [7.5, 8.4 mL]) in the small-volume group. Initial hemostasis was achieved in all patients studied. The number of episodes of recurrent bleeding was smaller in the large-volume group (12/78, 15.4%) compared with the small-volume group (24/78, 30.8%, p = 0.037). The volume of blood transfused after entry into the study, duration of hospital stay, numbers of patients requiring urgent surgery, and mortality rates were not statistically different between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Injection of a large volume (> 13 mL) of epinephrine can reduce the rate of recurrent bleeding in patients with high-risk peptic ulcer and is superior to injection of lesser volumes of epinephrine when used to achieve sustained hemostasis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)615-619
Number of pages5
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume55
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Peptic Ulcer
Epinephrine
Hemorrhage
Injections
Hemostasis
Blood Volume
Length of Stay
Mortality
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

A prospective, randomized trial of large-versus small-volume endoscopic injection of epinephrine for peptic ulcer bleeding. / Lin, Hwai Jeng; Hsieh, Yu Hsi; Tseng, Guan Ying; Perng, Chin Lin; Chang, Full Young; Lee, Shou Dong.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 55, No. 6, 05.2002, p. 615-619.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lin, Hwai Jeng ; Hsieh, Yu Hsi ; Tseng, Guan Ying ; Perng, Chin Lin ; Chang, Full Young ; Lee, Shou Dong. / A prospective, randomized trial of large-versus small-volume endoscopic injection of epinephrine for peptic ulcer bleeding. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2002 ; Vol. 55, No. 6. pp. 615-619.
@article{08ae7b0428ec4cf48bed732b9f14a214,
title = "A prospective, randomized trial of large-versus small-volume endoscopic injection of epinephrine for peptic ulcer bleeding",
abstract = "Background: Endoscopic injection of epinephrine in the treatment of bleeding peptic ulcer is considered highly effective, safe, inexpensive, and easy to use. However, bleeding recurs in 6{\%} to 36{\%} of patients. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal dose of epinephrine for endoscopic injection in the treatment of patients with bleeding peptic ulcer. Methods: One hundred fifty-six patients with active bleeding or nonbleeding visible vessels were randomized to receive small- (5-10 mL) or large-volume (13-20 mL) injections of a 1:10,000 solution of epinephrine. Results: The mean volume of epinephrine injected was 16.5 mL (95{\%} CI [15.7, 17.3 mL]) in the large-volume group and 8.0 mL (95{\%} CI [7.5, 8.4 mL]) in the small-volume group. Initial hemostasis was achieved in all patients studied. The number of episodes of recurrent bleeding was smaller in the large-volume group (12/78, 15.4{\%}) compared with the small-volume group (24/78, 30.8{\%}, p = 0.037). The volume of blood transfused after entry into the study, duration of hospital stay, numbers of patients requiring urgent surgery, and mortality rates were not statistically different between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Injection of a large volume (> 13 mL) of epinephrine can reduce the rate of recurrent bleeding in patients with high-risk peptic ulcer and is superior to injection of lesser volumes of epinephrine when used to achieve sustained hemostasis.",
author = "Lin, {Hwai Jeng} and Hsieh, {Yu Hsi} and Tseng, {Guan Ying} and Perng, {Chin Lin} and Chang, {Full Young} and Lee, {Shou Dong}",
year = "2002",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1067/mge.2002.123271",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "615--619",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A prospective, randomized trial of large-versus small-volume endoscopic injection of epinephrine for peptic ulcer bleeding

AU - Lin, Hwai Jeng

AU - Hsieh, Yu Hsi

AU - Tseng, Guan Ying

AU - Perng, Chin Lin

AU - Chang, Full Young

AU - Lee, Shou Dong

PY - 2002/5

Y1 - 2002/5

N2 - Background: Endoscopic injection of epinephrine in the treatment of bleeding peptic ulcer is considered highly effective, safe, inexpensive, and easy to use. However, bleeding recurs in 6% to 36% of patients. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal dose of epinephrine for endoscopic injection in the treatment of patients with bleeding peptic ulcer. Methods: One hundred fifty-six patients with active bleeding or nonbleeding visible vessels were randomized to receive small- (5-10 mL) or large-volume (13-20 mL) injections of a 1:10,000 solution of epinephrine. Results: The mean volume of epinephrine injected was 16.5 mL (95% CI [15.7, 17.3 mL]) in the large-volume group and 8.0 mL (95% CI [7.5, 8.4 mL]) in the small-volume group. Initial hemostasis was achieved in all patients studied. The number of episodes of recurrent bleeding was smaller in the large-volume group (12/78, 15.4%) compared with the small-volume group (24/78, 30.8%, p = 0.037). The volume of blood transfused after entry into the study, duration of hospital stay, numbers of patients requiring urgent surgery, and mortality rates were not statistically different between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Injection of a large volume (> 13 mL) of epinephrine can reduce the rate of recurrent bleeding in patients with high-risk peptic ulcer and is superior to injection of lesser volumes of epinephrine when used to achieve sustained hemostasis.

AB - Background: Endoscopic injection of epinephrine in the treatment of bleeding peptic ulcer is considered highly effective, safe, inexpensive, and easy to use. However, bleeding recurs in 6% to 36% of patients. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal dose of epinephrine for endoscopic injection in the treatment of patients with bleeding peptic ulcer. Methods: One hundred fifty-six patients with active bleeding or nonbleeding visible vessels were randomized to receive small- (5-10 mL) or large-volume (13-20 mL) injections of a 1:10,000 solution of epinephrine. Results: The mean volume of epinephrine injected was 16.5 mL (95% CI [15.7, 17.3 mL]) in the large-volume group and 8.0 mL (95% CI [7.5, 8.4 mL]) in the small-volume group. Initial hemostasis was achieved in all patients studied. The number of episodes of recurrent bleeding was smaller in the large-volume group (12/78, 15.4%) compared with the small-volume group (24/78, 30.8%, p = 0.037). The volume of blood transfused after entry into the study, duration of hospital stay, numbers of patients requiring urgent surgery, and mortality rates were not statistically different between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Injection of a large volume (> 13 mL) of epinephrine can reduce the rate of recurrent bleeding in patients with high-risk peptic ulcer and is superior to injection of lesser volumes of epinephrine when used to achieve sustained hemostasis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036582711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036582711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1067/mge.2002.123271

DO - 10.1067/mge.2002.123271

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 615

EP - 619

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 6

ER -