A pain education programme to improve patient satisfaction with cancer pain management: A randomised control trial

Pi Ling Chou, Chia-Chin Lin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim. The purpose of this study was (1) to evaluate the effectiveness of a pain education programme to increase the satisfaction of patients with cancer with regard to pain management and (2) to examine how patient satisfaction with pain management mediates the barriers to using analgesics and analgesic adherence. Background. The patients' satisfaction with pain management is not merely an indicator, it is actually a contributor to medication adherence. However, very few studies investigate methods for improving patient satisfaction with pain management. Design. This study used an experimental and longitudinal design. Methods. A total of 61 patient-family pairs (n=122) were randomly assigned to either experimental or control groups. The instruments included the American Pain Society outcome questionnaire, the Barriers Questionnaire-Taiwan form, self-reporting evaluations of analgesic adherence and the Pain Education Booklet. The experimental group (n=31) participated in a pain education programme, while those in the control group (n=30) did not. The two groups were compared using generalised estimation equations after the second and fourth weeks. A Sobel test was used to examine the mediating relationships among patient satisfaction with pain management, barriers to using analgesics and analgesic adherence. Results. The experimental group showed a significant improvement in the level of satisfaction they felt for physicians and nurses regarding pain management. For those in the experimental group, satisfaction with pain management was a significant mediator between barriers to using analgesics and analgesic adherence. Conclusions. This research provides evidence supporting the effectiveness of a pain education programme for patients and their family members in increasing patient satisfaction with regard to the management of cancer pain. Relevance to clinical practice. It is important for health providers to consider patient satisfaction when attempting to improve adherence to pain management regimes in a clinical setting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1858-1869
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Clinical Nursing
Volume20
Issue number13-14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2011

Fingerprint

Pain Management
Patient Satisfaction
Analgesics
Education
Pain
Control Groups
Diagnostic Self Evaluation
Pamphlets
Medication Adherence
Cancer Pain
Patient Education
Taiwan
Research Design
Nurses
Physicians
Health
Research

Keywords

  • Barriers to pain management
  • Cancer pain
  • Mediator
  • Nurses
  • Nursing
  • Pain education programme
  • Pain management
  • Patient satisfaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

A pain education programme to improve patient satisfaction with cancer pain management : A randomised control trial. / Chou, Pi Ling; Lin, Chia-Chin.

In: Journal of Clinical Nursing, Vol. 20, No. 13-14, 07.2011, p. 1858-1869.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2b8d574b16e44ad5a61f2384ffd5d1bc,
title = "A pain education programme to improve patient satisfaction with cancer pain management: A randomised control trial",
abstract = "Aim. The purpose of this study was (1) to evaluate the effectiveness of a pain education programme to increase the satisfaction of patients with cancer with regard to pain management and (2) to examine how patient satisfaction with pain management mediates the barriers to using analgesics and analgesic adherence. Background. The patients' satisfaction with pain management is not merely an indicator, it is actually a contributor to medication adherence. However, very few studies investigate methods for improving patient satisfaction with pain management. Design. This study used an experimental and longitudinal design. Methods. A total of 61 patient-family pairs (n=122) were randomly assigned to either experimental or control groups. The instruments included the American Pain Society outcome questionnaire, the Barriers Questionnaire-Taiwan form, self-reporting evaluations of analgesic adherence and the Pain Education Booklet. The experimental group (n=31) participated in a pain education programme, while those in the control group (n=30) did not. The two groups were compared using generalised estimation equations after the second and fourth weeks. A Sobel test was used to examine the mediating relationships among patient satisfaction with pain management, barriers to using analgesics and analgesic adherence. Results. The experimental group showed a significant improvement in the level of satisfaction they felt for physicians and nurses regarding pain management. For those in the experimental group, satisfaction with pain management was a significant mediator between barriers to using analgesics and analgesic adherence. Conclusions. This research provides evidence supporting the effectiveness of a pain education programme for patients and their family members in increasing patient satisfaction with regard to the management of cancer pain. Relevance to clinical practice. It is important for health providers to consider patient satisfaction when attempting to improve adherence to pain management regimes in a clinical setting.",
keywords = "Barriers to pain management, Cancer pain, Mediator, Nurses, Nursing, Pain education programme, Pain management, Patient satisfaction",
author = "Chou, {Pi Ling} and Chia-Chin Lin",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03740.x",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "1858--1869",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Nursing",
issn = "0962-1067",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "13-14",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A pain education programme to improve patient satisfaction with cancer pain management

T2 - A randomised control trial

AU - Chou, Pi Ling

AU - Lin, Chia-Chin

PY - 2011/7

Y1 - 2011/7

N2 - Aim. The purpose of this study was (1) to evaluate the effectiveness of a pain education programme to increase the satisfaction of patients with cancer with regard to pain management and (2) to examine how patient satisfaction with pain management mediates the barriers to using analgesics and analgesic adherence. Background. The patients' satisfaction with pain management is not merely an indicator, it is actually a contributor to medication adherence. However, very few studies investigate methods for improving patient satisfaction with pain management. Design. This study used an experimental and longitudinal design. Methods. A total of 61 patient-family pairs (n=122) were randomly assigned to either experimental or control groups. The instruments included the American Pain Society outcome questionnaire, the Barriers Questionnaire-Taiwan form, self-reporting evaluations of analgesic adherence and the Pain Education Booklet. The experimental group (n=31) participated in a pain education programme, while those in the control group (n=30) did not. The two groups were compared using generalised estimation equations after the second and fourth weeks. A Sobel test was used to examine the mediating relationships among patient satisfaction with pain management, barriers to using analgesics and analgesic adherence. Results. The experimental group showed a significant improvement in the level of satisfaction they felt for physicians and nurses regarding pain management. For those in the experimental group, satisfaction with pain management was a significant mediator between barriers to using analgesics and analgesic adherence. Conclusions. This research provides evidence supporting the effectiveness of a pain education programme for patients and their family members in increasing patient satisfaction with regard to the management of cancer pain. Relevance to clinical practice. It is important for health providers to consider patient satisfaction when attempting to improve adherence to pain management regimes in a clinical setting.

AB - Aim. The purpose of this study was (1) to evaluate the effectiveness of a pain education programme to increase the satisfaction of patients with cancer with regard to pain management and (2) to examine how patient satisfaction with pain management mediates the barriers to using analgesics and analgesic adherence. Background. The patients' satisfaction with pain management is not merely an indicator, it is actually a contributor to medication adherence. However, very few studies investigate methods for improving patient satisfaction with pain management. Design. This study used an experimental and longitudinal design. Methods. A total of 61 patient-family pairs (n=122) were randomly assigned to either experimental or control groups. The instruments included the American Pain Society outcome questionnaire, the Barriers Questionnaire-Taiwan form, self-reporting evaluations of analgesic adherence and the Pain Education Booklet. The experimental group (n=31) participated in a pain education programme, while those in the control group (n=30) did not. The two groups were compared using generalised estimation equations after the second and fourth weeks. A Sobel test was used to examine the mediating relationships among patient satisfaction with pain management, barriers to using analgesics and analgesic adherence. Results. The experimental group showed a significant improvement in the level of satisfaction they felt for physicians and nurses regarding pain management. For those in the experimental group, satisfaction with pain management was a significant mediator between barriers to using analgesics and analgesic adherence. Conclusions. This research provides evidence supporting the effectiveness of a pain education programme for patients and their family members in increasing patient satisfaction with regard to the management of cancer pain. Relevance to clinical practice. It is important for health providers to consider patient satisfaction when attempting to improve adherence to pain management regimes in a clinical setting.

KW - Barriers to pain management

KW - Cancer pain

KW - Mediator

KW - Nurses

KW - Nursing

KW - Pain education programme

KW - Pain management

KW - Patient satisfaction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80955177478&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80955177478&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03740.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03740.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 21615576

AN - SCOPUS:80955177478

VL - 20

SP - 1858

EP - 1869

JO - Journal of Clinical Nursing

JF - Journal of Clinical Nursing

SN - 0962-1067

IS - 13-14

ER -