A modified goal-directed protocol improves clinical outcomes in intensive care unit patients with septic shock: A randomized controlled trial

Shu Min Lin, Chien Da Huang, Horng Chyuan Lin, Chien Ying Liu, Chun Hua Wang, Han Pin Kuo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

176 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We evaluated whether a goal-directed protocol, without measurement of central venous oxygen saturation, would improve survival in medical intensive care unit (ICU) patients with septic shock. This is a prospective, controlled study in a 24-bed medical ICU at a tertiary care hospital. From a total of 241 consecutive patients with septic shock, 224 were randomly assigned to receive therapy with or without a written protocol using central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure, and urine output as therapeutic goals. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Implementation of goal-directed therapy caused a more rapid reversal of persistent shock (47 ± 22.8 vs. 65.4 ± 32.1 h, P = 0.006) and decreases of ICU (50% vs. 67.2%, P = 0.009) and in-hospital (53.7% vs. 71.6%, P = 0.006) mortality rates compared with non-goal-directed therapy. Patients receiving goal-directed therapy also had less risk for developing central nervous system or renal failure than patients without. Patients with goal-directed therapy received more fluid during the period of persistent shock (136.2 ± 119 vs. 88.6 ± 57.7 mL h, P = 0.034) and less delay in vasopressor administration (78 ± 22.2 vs. 104.4 ± 29 min, P = 0.001) than patients with non-goal therapy. Implementation of a goal-directed protocol improves survival and clinical outcomes in ICU patients with septic shock. These benefits may arise from adequate fluid resuscitation, earlier vasopressor administration, rapid shock reversal, and protection of major organ function. With central venous oxygen saturation measurement to detect tissue perfusion, the clinical outcomes may be further improved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)551-557
Number of pages7
JournalShock
Volume26
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Clinical Protocols
Septic Shock
Intensive Care Units
Randomized Controlled Trials
Shock
Therapeutics
Oxygen
Central Venous Pressure
Survival
Tertiary Healthcare
Tertiary Care Centers
Resuscitation
Renal Insufficiency
Arterial Pressure
Central Nervous System
Perfusion
Urine
Prospective Studies
Mortality

Keywords

  • Goal-directed
  • Protocol
  • Sepsis
  • Shock
  • Survival

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

A modified goal-directed protocol improves clinical outcomes in intensive care unit patients with septic shock : A randomized controlled trial. / Lin, Shu Min; Huang, Chien Da; Lin, Horng Chyuan; Liu, Chien Ying; Wang, Chun Hua; Kuo, Han Pin.

In: Shock, Vol. 26, No. 6, 01.12.2006, p. 551-557.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lin, Shu Min ; Huang, Chien Da ; Lin, Horng Chyuan ; Liu, Chien Ying ; Wang, Chun Hua ; Kuo, Han Pin. / A modified goal-directed protocol improves clinical outcomes in intensive care unit patients with septic shock : A randomized controlled trial. In: Shock. 2006 ; Vol. 26, No. 6. pp. 551-557.
@article{c5325476f01144038592f907ea802acf,
title = "A modified goal-directed protocol improves clinical outcomes in intensive care unit patients with septic shock: A randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "We evaluated whether a goal-directed protocol, without measurement of central venous oxygen saturation, would improve survival in medical intensive care unit (ICU) patients with septic shock. This is a prospective, controlled study in a 24-bed medical ICU at a tertiary care hospital. From a total of 241 consecutive patients with septic shock, 224 were randomly assigned to receive therapy with or without a written protocol using central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure, and urine output as therapeutic goals. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Implementation of goal-directed therapy caused a more rapid reversal of persistent shock (47 ± 22.8 vs. 65.4 ± 32.1 h, P = 0.006) and decreases of ICU (50{\%} vs. 67.2{\%}, P = 0.009) and in-hospital (53.7{\%} vs. 71.6{\%}, P = 0.006) mortality rates compared with non-goal-directed therapy. Patients receiving goal-directed therapy also had less risk for developing central nervous system or renal failure than patients without. Patients with goal-directed therapy received more fluid during the period of persistent shock (136.2 ± 119 vs. 88.6 ± 57.7 mL h, P = 0.034) and less delay in vasopressor administration (78 ± 22.2 vs. 104.4 ± 29 min, P = 0.001) than patients with non-goal therapy. Implementation of a goal-directed protocol improves survival and clinical outcomes in ICU patients with septic shock. These benefits may arise from adequate fluid resuscitation, earlier vasopressor administration, rapid shock reversal, and protection of major organ function. With central venous oxygen saturation measurement to detect tissue perfusion, the clinical outcomes may be further improved.",
keywords = "Goal-directed, Protocol, Sepsis, Shock, Survival",
author = "Lin, {Shu Min} and Huang, {Chien Da} and Lin, {Horng Chyuan} and Liu, {Chien Ying} and Wang, {Chun Hua} and Kuo, {Han Pin}",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/01.shk.0000232271.09440.8f",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "551--557",
journal = "Shock",
issn = "1073-2322",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A modified goal-directed protocol improves clinical outcomes in intensive care unit patients with septic shock

T2 - A randomized controlled trial

AU - Lin, Shu Min

AU - Huang, Chien Da

AU - Lin, Horng Chyuan

AU - Liu, Chien Ying

AU - Wang, Chun Hua

AU - Kuo, Han Pin

PY - 2006/12/1

Y1 - 2006/12/1

N2 - We evaluated whether a goal-directed protocol, without measurement of central venous oxygen saturation, would improve survival in medical intensive care unit (ICU) patients with septic shock. This is a prospective, controlled study in a 24-bed medical ICU at a tertiary care hospital. From a total of 241 consecutive patients with septic shock, 224 were randomly assigned to receive therapy with or without a written protocol using central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure, and urine output as therapeutic goals. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Implementation of goal-directed therapy caused a more rapid reversal of persistent shock (47 ± 22.8 vs. 65.4 ± 32.1 h, P = 0.006) and decreases of ICU (50% vs. 67.2%, P = 0.009) and in-hospital (53.7% vs. 71.6%, P = 0.006) mortality rates compared with non-goal-directed therapy. Patients receiving goal-directed therapy also had less risk for developing central nervous system or renal failure than patients without. Patients with goal-directed therapy received more fluid during the period of persistent shock (136.2 ± 119 vs. 88.6 ± 57.7 mL h, P = 0.034) and less delay in vasopressor administration (78 ± 22.2 vs. 104.4 ± 29 min, P = 0.001) than patients with non-goal therapy. Implementation of a goal-directed protocol improves survival and clinical outcomes in ICU patients with septic shock. These benefits may arise from adequate fluid resuscitation, earlier vasopressor administration, rapid shock reversal, and protection of major organ function. With central venous oxygen saturation measurement to detect tissue perfusion, the clinical outcomes may be further improved.

AB - We evaluated whether a goal-directed protocol, without measurement of central venous oxygen saturation, would improve survival in medical intensive care unit (ICU) patients with septic shock. This is a prospective, controlled study in a 24-bed medical ICU at a tertiary care hospital. From a total of 241 consecutive patients with septic shock, 224 were randomly assigned to receive therapy with or without a written protocol using central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure, and urine output as therapeutic goals. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Implementation of goal-directed therapy caused a more rapid reversal of persistent shock (47 ± 22.8 vs. 65.4 ± 32.1 h, P = 0.006) and decreases of ICU (50% vs. 67.2%, P = 0.009) and in-hospital (53.7% vs. 71.6%, P = 0.006) mortality rates compared with non-goal-directed therapy. Patients receiving goal-directed therapy also had less risk for developing central nervous system or renal failure than patients without. Patients with goal-directed therapy received more fluid during the period of persistent shock (136.2 ± 119 vs. 88.6 ± 57.7 mL h, P = 0.034) and less delay in vasopressor administration (78 ± 22.2 vs. 104.4 ± 29 min, P = 0.001) than patients with non-goal therapy. Implementation of a goal-directed protocol improves survival and clinical outcomes in ICU patients with septic shock. These benefits may arise from adequate fluid resuscitation, earlier vasopressor administration, rapid shock reversal, and protection of major organ function. With central venous oxygen saturation measurement to detect tissue perfusion, the clinical outcomes may be further improved.

KW - Goal-directed

KW - Protocol

KW - Sepsis

KW - Shock

KW - Survival

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33751228986&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33751228986&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.shk.0000232271.09440.8f

DO - 10.1097/01.shk.0000232271.09440.8f

M3 - Article

C2 - 17117128

AN - SCOPUS:33751228986

VL - 26

SP - 551

EP - 557

JO - Shock

JF - Shock

SN - 1073-2322

IS - 6

ER -