A meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of three screening tools for insomnia

Hsiao-Yean Chiu, Ling Yin Chang, Yu Jung Hsieh, Pei-Shan Tsai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Insomnia is a highly prevalent health complaint in the modern societies; however, insomnia remains under-diagnosed and under-treated. Although screening tools, including the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS), and Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), are widely used for assessing the risk of insomnia, the diagnostic properties have yet to be summarized in a systematic manner. Objectives To estimate and to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the ISI, AIS, and PSQI for insomnia screening. Data sources We systematically searched EMBASE, PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Chinese Electronic Periodic Services for data from their inception to May 20, 2015. Data selection Original articles that had assessed the sensitivity and specificity of the ISI, AIS, or PSQI against a reference standard in adult participants (age > 18) were included. Results A total of 19 studies comprising 4693 participants were included. The pooled sensitivity for the ISI, AIS, and PSQI was 88% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.79 to 0.93), 91% (0.87 to 0.93), and 94% (0.86 to 0.98), respectively. The pooled specificity was 85% (0.68 to 0.94), 87% (0.68 to 0.95), and 76% (0.64 to 0.85); and the pooled DORs was 41.93 (8.77 to 200.33), 67.7 (23.4 to 196.1), and 53 (15.5 to 186.2), respectively. The summary estimates did not differ significantly among the ISI, AIS and PSQI (all P > 0.05). Conclusions The current evidence indicates that the ISI, AIS, and PSQI yield comparable diagnostic properties for insomnia screening.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)85-92
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Psychosomatic Research
Volume87
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 1 2016

Fingerprint

Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders
Meta-Analysis
Sleep
Information Storage and Retrieval
PubMed

Keywords

  • Diagnostic metaanalysis
  • Insomnia
  • Insomnia screening
  • Instrument validation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

A meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of three screening tools for insomnia. / Chiu, Hsiao-Yean; Chang, Ling Yin; Hsieh, Yu Jung; Tsai, Pei-Shan.

In: Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Vol. 87, 01.08.2016, p. 85-92.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dd305828896e44729846edfbd654666d,
title = "A meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of three screening tools for insomnia",
abstract = "Background Insomnia is a highly prevalent health complaint in the modern societies; however, insomnia remains under-diagnosed and under-treated. Although screening tools, including the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS), and Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), are widely used for assessing the risk of insomnia, the diagnostic properties have yet to be summarized in a systematic manner. Objectives To estimate and to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the ISI, AIS, and PSQI for insomnia screening. Data sources We systematically searched EMBASE, PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Chinese Electronic Periodic Services for data from their inception to May 20, 2015. Data selection Original articles that had assessed the sensitivity and specificity of the ISI, AIS, or PSQI against a reference standard in adult participants (age > 18) were included. Results A total of 19 studies comprising 4693 participants were included. The pooled sensitivity for the ISI, AIS, and PSQI was 88{\%} (95{\%} confidence interval [CI] = 0.79 to 0.93), 91{\%} (0.87 to 0.93), and 94{\%} (0.86 to 0.98), respectively. The pooled specificity was 85{\%} (0.68 to 0.94), 87{\%} (0.68 to 0.95), and 76{\%} (0.64 to 0.85); and the pooled DORs was 41.93 (8.77 to 200.33), 67.7 (23.4 to 196.1), and 53 (15.5 to 186.2), respectively. The summary estimates did not differ significantly among the ISI, AIS and PSQI (all P > 0.05). Conclusions The current evidence indicates that the ISI, AIS, and PSQI yield comparable diagnostic properties for insomnia screening.",
keywords = "Diagnostic metaanalysis, Insomnia, Insomnia screening, Instrument validation",
author = "Hsiao-Yean Chiu and Chang, {Ling Yin} and Hsieh, {Yu Jung} and Pei-Shan Tsai",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.06.010",
language = "English",
volume = "87",
pages = "85--92",
journal = "Journal of Psychosomatic Research",
issn = "0022-3999",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of three screening tools for insomnia

AU - Chiu, Hsiao-Yean

AU - Chang, Ling Yin

AU - Hsieh, Yu Jung

AU - Tsai, Pei-Shan

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - Background Insomnia is a highly prevalent health complaint in the modern societies; however, insomnia remains under-diagnosed and under-treated. Although screening tools, including the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS), and Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), are widely used for assessing the risk of insomnia, the diagnostic properties have yet to be summarized in a systematic manner. Objectives To estimate and to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the ISI, AIS, and PSQI for insomnia screening. Data sources We systematically searched EMBASE, PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Chinese Electronic Periodic Services for data from their inception to May 20, 2015. Data selection Original articles that had assessed the sensitivity and specificity of the ISI, AIS, or PSQI against a reference standard in adult participants (age > 18) were included. Results A total of 19 studies comprising 4693 participants were included. The pooled sensitivity for the ISI, AIS, and PSQI was 88% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.79 to 0.93), 91% (0.87 to 0.93), and 94% (0.86 to 0.98), respectively. The pooled specificity was 85% (0.68 to 0.94), 87% (0.68 to 0.95), and 76% (0.64 to 0.85); and the pooled DORs was 41.93 (8.77 to 200.33), 67.7 (23.4 to 196.1), and 53 (15.5 to 186.2), respectively. The summary estimates did not differ significantly among the ISI, AIS and PSQI (all P > 0.05). Conclusions The current evidence indicates that the ISI, AIS, and PSQI yield comparable diagnostic properties for insomnia screening.

AB - Background Insomnia is a highly prevalent health complaint in the modern societies; however, insomnia remains under-diagnosed and under-treated. Although screening tools, including the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS), and Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), are widely used for assessing the risk of insomnia, the diagnostic properties have yet to be summarized in a systematic manner. Objectives To estimate and to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the ISI, AIS, and PSQI for insomnia screening. Data sources We systematically searched EMBASE, PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Chinese Electronic Periodic Services for data from their inception to May 20, 2015. Data selection Original articles that had assessed the sensitivity and specificity of the ISI, AIS, or PSQI against a reference standard in adult participants (age > 18) were included. Results A total of 19 studies comprising 4693 participants were included. The pooled sensitivity for the ISI, AIS, and PSQI was 88% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.79 to 0.93), 91% (0.87 to 0.93), and 94% (0.86 to 0.98), respectively. The pooled specificity was 85% (0.68 to 0.94), 87% (0.68 to 0.95), and 76% (0.64 to 0.85); and the pooled DORs was 41.93 (8.77 to 200.33), 67.7 (23.4 to 196.1), and 53 (15.5 to 186.2), respectively. The summary estimates did not differ significantly among the ISI, AIS and PSQI (all P > 0.05). Conclusions The current evidence indicates that the ISI, AIS, and PSQI yield comparable diagnostic properties for insomnia screening.

KW - Diagnostic metaanalysis

KW - Insomnia

KW - Insomnia screening

KW - Instrument validation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84976601102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84976601102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.06.010

DO - 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.06.010

M3 - Article

C2 - 27411756

AN - SCOPUS:84976601102

VL - 87

SP - 85

EP - 92

JO - Journal of Psychosomatic Research

JF - Journal of Psychosomatic Research

SN - 0022-3999

ER -