A comparison of the effect of carbomer-, cellulose-, and mineral oil-based artificial tear formulations

I. Jong Wang, I. C. Lin, Y. C. Hou, F. R. Hu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE. To compare the efficacy, safety, and local tolerance between carbomer-based artificial tears, cellulose-, and mineral oil-based artificial tears. METHODS. A randomized, open-label, parallel-group comparative 28-day study was designed for 67 patients who were randomized into three treatment groups. Measurements included the scoring of total subjective symptoms and objective signs, Schirmer-Jones test values, and tear break-up time (BUT) at baseline, and after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment. Safety of study treatment was also assessed. Outcomes measured at baseline and 2 and 4 weeks follow-up included the scoring of total subjective symptoms and objective signs, Schirmer-Jones test values, and tear BUT, subjective assessments, and safety. RESULTS. There were no differences regarding total scores, Schirmer-Jones test, or tear BUT at baseline among these three groups at 2 and 4 weeks. Patients in all three treatment groups experienced a significant improvement from baseline in total scores and Schirmer-Jones test values after treatment. Subjective assessment was better with carbomer-based treatment. CONCLUSIONS. Each artificial tear formulation successfully relieved symptoms and signs of keratoconjunctivitis sicca. The tolerance of carbomer-based artificial tears was comparable to that of cellulose- and mineral oil-based artificial tears.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)151-159
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume17
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mineral Oil
Cellulose
Tears
Signs and Symptoms
Safety
Therapeutics
Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca
carbomer
Lubricant Eye Drops

Keywords

  • Carbomer-based artificial tears
  • Cellulose-based artificial tears
  • Keratoconjunctivitis sicca
  • Mineral oil-based artificial tears

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

A comparison of the effect of carbomer-, cellulose-, and mineral oil-based artificial tear formulations. / Wang, I. Jong; Lin, I. C.; Hou, Y. C.; Hu, F. R.

In: European Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 17, No. 2, 03.2007, p. 151-159.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b11ebe6df8764ee78c5a066ff1b60056,
title = "A comparison of the effect of carbomer-, cellulose-, and mineral oil-based artificial tear formulations",
abstract = "PURPOSE. To compare the efficacy, safety, and local tolerance between carbomer-based artificial tears, cellulose-, and mineral oil-based artificial tears. METHODS. A randomized, open-label, parallel-group comparative 28-day study was designed for 67 patients who were randomized into three treatment groups. Measurements included the scoring of total subjective symptoms and objective signs, Schirmer-Jones test values, and tear break-up time (BUT) at baseline, and after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment. Safety of study treatment was also assessed. Outcomes measured at baseline and 2 and 4 weeks follow-up included the scoring of total subjective symptoms and objective signs, Schirmer-Jones test values, and tear BUT, subjective assessments, and safety. RESULTS. There were no differences regarding total scores, Schirmer-Jones test, or tear BUT at baseline among these three groups at 2 and 4 weeks. Patients in all three treatment groups experienced a significant improvement from baseline in total scores and Schirmer-Jones test values after treatment. Subjective assessment was better with carbomer-based treatment. CONCLUSIONS. Each artificial tear formulation successfully relieved symptoms and signs of keratoconjunctivitis sicca. The tolerance of carbomer-based artificial tears was comparable to that of cellulose- and mineral oil-based artificial tears.",
keywords = "Carbomer-based artificial tears, Cellulose-based artificial tears, Keratoconjunctivitis sicca, Mineral oil-based artificial tears",
author = "Wang, {I. Jong} and Lin, {I. C.} and Hou, {Y. C.} and Hu, {F. R.}",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "151--159",
journal = "European Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "1120-6721",
publisher = "Wichtig Publishing",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of the effect of carbomer-, cellulose-, and mineral oil-based artificial tear formulations

AU - Wang, I. Jong

AU - Lin, I. C.

AU - Hou, Y. C.

AU - Hu, F. R.

PY - 2007/3

Y1 - 2007/3

N2 - PURPOSE. To compare the efficacy, safety, and local tolerance between carbomer-based artificial tears, cellulose-, and mineral oil-based artificial tears. METHODS. A randomized, open-label, parallel-group comparative 28-day study was designed for 67 patients who were randomized into three treatment groups. Measurements included the scoring of total subjective symptoms and objective signs, Schirmer-Jones test values, and tear break-up time (BUT) at baseline, and after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment. Safety of study treatment was also assessed. Outcomes measured at baseline and 2 and 4 weeks follow-up included the scoring of total subjective symptoms and objective signs, Schirmer-Jones test values, and tear BUT, subjective assessments, and safety. RESULTS. There were no differences regarding total scores, Schirmer-Jones test, or tear BUT at baseline among these three groups at 2 and 4 weeks. Patients in all three treatment groups experienced a significant improvement from baseline in total scores and Schirmer-Jones test values after treatment. Subjective assessment was better with carbomer-based treatment. CONCLUSIONS. Each artificial tear formulation successfully relieved symptoms and signs of keratoconjunctivitis sicca. The tolerance of carbomer-based artificial tears was comparable to that of cellulose- and mineral oil-based artificial tears.

AB - PURPOSE. To compare the efficacy, safety, and local tolerance between carbomer-based artificial tears, cellulose-, and mineral oil-based artificial tears. METHODS. A randomized, open-label, parallel-group comparative 28-day study was designed for 67 patients who were randomized into three treatment groups. Measurements included the scoring of total subjective symptoms and objective signs, Schirmer-Jones test values, and tear break-up time (BUT) at baseline, and after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment. Safety of study treatment was also assessed. Outcomes measured at baseline and 2 and 4 weeks follow-up included the scoring of total subjective symptoms and objective signs, Schirmer-Jones test values, and tear BUT, subjective assessments, and safety. RESULTS. There were no differences regarding total scores, Schirmer-Jones test, or tear BUT at baseline among these three groups at 2 and 4 weeks. Patients in all three treatment groups experienced a significant improvement from baseline in total scores and Schirmer-Jones test values after treatment. Subjective assessment was better with carbomer-based treatment. CONCLUSIONS. Each artificial tear formulation successfully relieved symptoms and signs of keratoconjunctivitis sicca. The tolerance of carbomer-based artificial tears was comparable to that of cellulose- and mineral oil-based artificial tears.

KW - Carbomer-based artificial tears

KW - Cellulose-based artificial tears

KW - Keratoconjunctivitis sicca

KW - Mineral oil-based artificial tears

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250346940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250346940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 17415686

AN - SCOPUS:34250346940

VL - 17

SP - 151

EP - 159

JO - European Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - European Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 1120-6721

IS - 2

ER -