A comparison of sitting posture adaptations of pregnant and non-pregnant females

Yung Hui Lee, Li Ling Her, Yang Hwei Tsuang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The postural differences between seated pregnant and non-pregnant subjects were studied, and the effects of various sitting workstation designs were assessed. Five pregnant and five non-pregnant subjects participated in this study. The experimental variables were the table-chair-vertical-distance (35cm and 30cm) and the seat-inclination-angle (0°, +10°and +20°). The seated working postures of the last 10 min of a 50-min sitting session were videotaped and analyzed using a 2D motion analysis system. Postural differences were observed between the pregnant and non-pregnant groups which may be attributed to the changes and/or mechanisms associated with pregnancy. The increased size of the abdomen requires more room in front of the body; in the pregnant subjects this was obtained by holding the upper-arm further from the body, inclining the upper trunk more anterior, and extending the hip more. A seat with a sloping angle of 10°was found to reduce the biomechanical loading on the lower back and in subjective ratings from both groups, was preferred over the other seat angles. Relevance to industry. Pregnant women make up a small but significant part of the workforce. Changes in body form and working posture due to pregnancy change the effective working envelope and increase the biomechanical loads on the musculoskeletal system resulting in an increase in the risk of lower-back pain. This study examined the posture adaptations and the effects of workstation design on pregnant and non-pregnant subjects. Copyright (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)391-396
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
Volume23
Issue number5-6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 20 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Seats
Posture
workstation
Musculoskeletal system
pregnancy
Pregnancy
Musculoskeletal System
Low Back Pain
Abdomen
Hip
Pregnant Women
Industry
Arm
systems analysis
pain
Group
rating
industry

Keywords

  • Pregnant women
  • Seated workstation
  • Sitting posture

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics

Cite this

A comparison of sitting posture adaptations of pregnant and non-pregnant females. / Lee, Yung Hui; Her, Li Ling; Tsuang, Yang Hwei.

In: International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 23, No. 5-6, 20.03.1999, p. 391-396.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5d7651f8440b4398b03954ee7234847c,
title = "A comparison of sitting posture adaptations of pregnant and non-pregnant females",
abstract = "The postural differences between seated pregnant and non-pregnant subjects were studied, and the effects of various sitting workstation designs were assessed. Five pregnant and five non-pregnant subjects participated in this study. The experimental variables were the table-chair-vertical-distance (35cm and 30cm) and the seat-inclination-angle (0°, +10°and +20°). The seated working postures of the last 10 min of a 50-min sitting session were videotaped and analyzed using a 2D motion analysis system. Postural differences were observed between the pregnant and non-pregnant groups which may be attributed to the changes and/or mechanisms associated with pregnancy. The increased size of the abdomen requires more room in front of the body; in the pregnant subjects this was obtained by holding the upper-arm further from the body, inclining the upper trunk more anterior, and extending the hip more. A seat with a sloping angle of 10°was found to reduce the biomechanical loading on the lower back and in subjective ratings from both groups, was preferred over the other seat angles. Relevance to industry. Pregnant women make up a small but significant part of the workforce. Changes in body form and working posture due to pregnancy change the effective working envelope and increase the biomechanical loads on the musculoskeletal system resulting in an increase in the risk of lower-back pain. This study examined the posture adaptations and the effects of workstation design on pregnant and non-pregnant subjects. Copyright (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V.",
keywords = "Pregnant women, Seated workstation, Sitting posture",
author = "Lee, {Yung Hui} and Her, {Li Ling} and Tsuang, {Yang Hwei}",
year = "1999",
month = "3",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1016/S0169-8141(97)00060-7",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "391--396",
journal = "International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics",
issn = "0169-8141",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "5-6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of sitting posture adaptations of pregnant and non-pregnant females

AU - Lee, Yung Hui

AU - Her, Li Ling

AU - Tsuang, Yang Hwei

PY - 1999/3/20

Y1 - 1999/3/20

N2 - The postural differences between seated pregnant and non-pregnant subjects were studied, and the effects of various sitting workstation designs were assessed. Five pregnant and five non-pregnant subjects participated in this study. The experimental variables were the table-chair-vertical-distance (35cm and 30cm) and the seat-inclination-angle (0°, +10°and +20°). The seated working postures of the last 10 min of a 50-min sitting session were videotaped and analyzed using a 2D motion analysis system. Postural differences were observed between the pregnant and non-pregnant groups which may be attributed to the changes and/or mechanisms associated with pregnancy. The increased size of the abdomen requires more room in front of the body; in the pregnant subjects this was obtained by holding the upper-arm further from the body, inclining the upper trunk more anterior, and extending the hip more. A seat with a sloping angle of 10°was found to reduce the biomechanical loading on the lower back and in subjective ratings from both groups, was preferred over the other seat angles. Relevance to industry. Pregnant women make up a small but significant part of the workforce. Changes in body form and working posture due to pregnancy change the effective working envelope and increase the biomechanical loads on the musculoskeletal system resulting in an increase in the risk of lower-back pain. This study examined the posture adaptations and the effects of workstation design on pregnant and non-pregnant subjects. Copyright (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V.

AB - The postural differences between seated pregnant and non-pregnant subjects were studied, and the effects of various sitting workstation designs were assessed. Five pregnant and five non-pregnant subjects participated in this study. The experimental variables were the table-chair-vertical-distance (35cm and 30cm) and the seat-inclination-angle (0°, +10°and +20°). The seated working postures of the last 10 min of a 50-min sitting session were videotaped and analyzed using a 2D motion analysis system. Postural differences were observed between the pregnant and non-pregnant groups which may be attributed to the changes and/or mechanisms associated with pregnancy. The increased size of the abdomen requires more room in front of the body; in the pregnant subjects this was obtained by holding the upper-arm further from the body, inclining the upper trunk more anterior, and extending the hip more. A seat with a sloping angle of 10°was found to reduce the biomechanical loading on the lower back and in subjective ratings from both groups, was preferred over the other seat angles. Relevance to industry. Pregnant women make up a small but significant part of the workforce. Changes in body form and working posture due to pregnancy change the effective working envelope and increase the biomechanical loads on the musculoskeletal system resulting in an increase in the risk of lower-back pain. This study examined the posture adaptations and the effects of workstation design on pregnant and non-pregnant subjects. Copyright (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V.

KW - Pregnant women

KW - Seated workstation

KW - Sitting posture

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0345471902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0345471902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0169-8141(97)00060-7

DO - 10.1016/S0169-8141(97)00060-7

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 391

EP - 396

JO - International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics

JF - International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics

SN - 0169-8141

IS - 5-6

ER -