A comparison of neural responses to appetitive and aversive stimuli in humans and other mammals

Dave J. Hayes, Niall W. Duncan, Jiameng Xu, Georg Northoff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Distinguishing potentially harmful or beneficial stimuli is necessary for the self-preservation and well-being of all organisms. This assessment requires the ongoing valuation of environmental stimuli. Despite much work on the processing of aversive- and appetitive-related brain signals, it is not clear to what degree these two processes interact across the brain. To help clarify this issue, this report used a cross-species comparative approach in humans (i.e. meta-analysis of imaging data) and other mammals (i.e. targeted review of functional neuroanatomy in rodents and non-human primates). Human meta-analysis results suggest network components that appear selective for appetitive (e.g. ventromedial prefrontal cortex, ventral tegmental area) or aversive (e.g. cingulate/supplementary motor cortex, periaqueductal grey) processing, or that reflect overlapping (e.g. anterior insula, amygdala) or asymmetrical, i.e. apparently lateralized, activity (e.g. orbitofrontal cortex, ventral striatum). However, a closer look at the known value-related mechanisms from the animal literature suggests that all of these macroanatomical regions are involved in the processing of both appetitive and aversive stimuli. Differential spatiotemporal network dynamics may help explain similarities and differences in appetitive- and aversion-related activity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)350-368
Number of pages19
JournalNeuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
Volume45
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Prefrontal Cortex
Meta-Analysis
Mammals
Neuroanatomy
Periaqueductal Gray
Ventral Tegmental Area
Motor Cortex
Brain
Amygdala
Primates
Rodentia
Ventral Striatum

Keywords

  • Affective neuroscience
  • Aversion
  • Electrophysiology
  • Emotion
  • FMRI
  • Human
  • Meta-analysis
  • Monkey
  • Motivation
  • Mouse
  • Neuroimaging
  • Punishment
  • Rat
  • Reinforcement
  • Reward
  • Valence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

A comparison of neural responses to appetitive and aversive stimuli in humans and other mammals. / Hayes, Dave J.; Duncan, Niall W.; Xu, Jiameng; Northoff, Georg.

In: Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, Vol. 45, 2014, p. 350-368.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7314776efa944cb6ac5fd714711c1fb9,
title = "A comparison of neural responses to appetitive and aversive stimuli in humans and other mammals",
abstract = "Distinguishing potentially harmful or beneficial stimuli is necessary for the self-preservation and well-being of all organisms. This assessment requires the ongoing valuation of environmental stimuli. Despite much work on the processing of aversive- and appetitive-related brain signals, it is not clear to what degree these two processes interact across the brain. To help clarify this issue, this report used a cross-species comparative approach in humans (i.e. meta-analysis of imaging data) and other mammals (i.e. targeted review of functional neuroanatomy in rodents and non-human primates). Human meta-analysis results suggest network components that appear selective for appetitive (e.g. ventromedial prefrontal cortex, ventral tegmental area) or aversive (e.g. cingulate/supplementary motor cortex, periaqueductal grey) processing, or that reflect overlapping (e.g. anterior insula, amygdala) or asymmetrical, i.e. apparently lateralized, activity (e.g. orbitofrontal cortex, ventral striatum). However, a closer look at the known value-related mechanisms from the animal literature suggests that all of these macroanatomical regions are involved in the processing of both appetitive and aversive stimuli. Differential spatiotemporal network dynamics may help explain similarities and differences in appetitive- and aversion-related activity.",
keywords = "Affective neuroscience, Aversion, Electrophysiology, Emotion, FMRI, Human, Meta-analysis, Monkey, Motivation, Mouse, Neuroimaging, Punishment, Rat, Reinforcement, Reward, Valence",
author = "Hayes, {Dave J.} and Duncan, {Niall W.} and Jiameng Xu and Georg Northoff",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.06.018",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "350--368",
journal = "Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews",
issn = "0149-7634",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of neural responses to appetitive and aversive stimuli in humans and other mammals

AU - Hayes, Dave J.

AU - Duncan, Niall W.

AU - Xu, Jiameng

AU - Northoff, Georg

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Distinguishing potentially harmful or beneficial stimuli is necessary for the self-preservation and well-being of all organisms. This assessment requires the ongoing valuation of environmental stimuli. Despite much work on the processing of aversive- and appetitive-related brain signals, it is not clear to what degree these two processes interact across the brain. To help clarify this issue, this report used a cross-species comparative approach in humans (i.e. meta-analysis of imaging data) and other mammals (i.e. targeted review of functional neuroanatomy in rodents and non-human primates). Human meta-analysis results suggest network components that appear selective for appetitive (e.g. ventromedial prefrontal cortex, ventral tegmental area) or aversive (e.g. cingulate/supplementary motor cortex, periaqueductal grey) processing, or that reflect overlapping (e.g. anterior insula, amygdala) or asymmetrical, i.e. apparently lateralized, activity (e.g. orbitofrontal cortex, ventral striatum). However, a closer look at the known value-related mechanisms from the animal literature suggests that all of these macroanatomical regions are involved in the processing of both appetitive and aversive stimuli. Differential spatiotemporal network dynamics may help explain similarities and differences in appetitive- and aversion-related activity.

AB - Distinguishing potentially harmful or beneficial stimuli is necessary for the self-preservation and well-being of all organisms. This assessment requires the ongoing valuation of environmental stimuli. Despite much work on the processing of aversive- and appetitive-related brain signals, it is not clear to what degree these two processes interact across the brain. To help clarify this issue, this report used a cross-species comparative approach in humans (i.e. meta-analysis of imaging data) and other mammals (i.e. targeted review of functional neuroanatomy in rodents and non-human primates). Human meta-analysis results suggest network components that appear selective for appetitive (e.g. ventromedial prefrontal cortex, ventral tegmental area) or aversive (e.g. cingulate/supplementary motor cortex, periaqueductal grey) processing, or that reflect overlapping (e.g. anterior insula, amygdala) or asymmetrical, i.e. apparently lateralized, activity (e.g. orbitofrontal cortex, ventral striatum). However, a closer look at the known value-related mechanisms from the animal literature suggests that all of these macroanatomical regions are involved in the processing of both appetitive and aversive stimuli. Differential spatiotemporal network dynamics may help explain similarities and differences in appetitive- and aversion-related activity.

KW - Affective neuroscience

KW - Aversion

KW - Electrophysiology

KW - Emotion

KW - FMRI

KW - Human

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Monkey

KW - Motivation

KW - Mouse

KW - Neuroimaging

KW - Punishment

KW - Rat

KW - Reinforcement

KW - Reward

KW - Valence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904903561&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904903561&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.06.018

DO - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.06.018

M3 - Article

C2 - 25010558

AN - SCOPUS:84904903561

VL - 45

SP - 350

EP - 368

JO - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews

JF - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews

SN - 0149-7634

ER -