司法違憲審查中的證據品質與事理觀點:從證據法角度出發的美國經驗與台灣借鏡

Translated title of the contribution: A Comparative Study on "Evidence Law" in Constitutional Review: External-Knowledge's Quality Control, Experiential Perspectives, and Their Contribution to the Reasoning of the Taiwanese Constitutional Court and the U.S. Supreme Court

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A Comparative Study on "Evidence Law" in Constitutional Review: External-Knowledge's Quality Control, Experiential Perspectives, and Their Contribution to the Reasoning of the Taiwanese Constitutional Court and the U.S. Supreme Court
Translated title of the contributionA Comparative Study on "Evidence Law" in Constitutional Review: External-Knowledge's Quality Control, Experiential Perspectives, and Their Contribution to the Reasoning of the Taiwanese Constitutional Court and the U.S. Supreme Court
Original languageTraditional Chinese
Pages (from-to)251-308
Number of pages58
Journal中研院法學期刊
Issue number20
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Constitutional review
  • Evidence law
  • External-knowledge
  • Experiential perspectives
  • Interdisciplinary approaches
  • Amicus curiae brief
  • Daubert
  • Cross-examination

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A Comparative Study on "Evidence Law" in Constitutional Review: External-Knowledge's Quality Control, Experiential Perspectives, and Their Contribution to the Reasoning of the Taiwanese Constitutional Court and the U.S. Supreme Court'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this