司法違憲審查中的證據品質與事理觀點:從證據法角度出發的美國經驗與台灣借鏡

Translated title of the contribution: A Comparative Study on "Evidence Law" in Constitutional Review: External-Knowledge's Quality Control, Experiential Perspectives, and Their Contribution to the Reasoning of the Taiwanese Constitutional Court and the U.S. Supreme Court

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A Comparative Study on "Evidence Law" in Constitutional Review: External-Knowledge's Quality Control, Experiential Perspectives, and Their Contribution to the Reasoning of the Taiwanese Constitutional Court and the U.S. Supreme Court
Original languageTraditional Chinese
Pages (from-to)251-308
Number of pages58
Journal中研院法學期刊
Issue number20
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2017
Externally publishedYes

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Constitutional review
  • Evidence law
  • External-knowledge
  • Experiential perspectives
  • Interdisciplinary approaches
  • Amicus curiae brief
  • Daubert
  • Cross-examination

Cite this