A comparative study of clinical severity scoring systems in ICUs in Taiwan

Chao Hsiun Tang, Che Ming Yang, Chi Yuan Chuang, Ming Lee Chang, Yu Chwen Huang, Chin Feng Huang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to compare the performance of five commonly applied severity measures. Severity scoring systems have been developed in response to an increased emphasis on the evaluation and monitoring of health care services. The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II system is the only one that has been widely applied in Taiwan. This study is designed to ascertain the outcome prediction abilities of various severity measures in ICUs in Taiwan. Materials and Methods: All five severity instruments were applied to the same patient sample to assess the correlations and relative performance of all five systems. The data collection process was done in a 600-bed regional hospital with 101 valid cases recorded. Results: All five major severity scores, Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score (MODS), Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS), APACHE II, Mortality Probability Model 24 (MPM24), and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS), significantly correlated with each other. The accuracy of mortality prediction of each measure ranged from 0.71 to 0.88 as illustrated by the area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. The predictive power of each severity measure against the total expenses for each admission was poor in light of the fact that the only significant coefficient of determination was as low as 0.064. APACHE II's performance was as good as all the other systems. MODS performed better in predicting costs of surgical cases with the coefficient of determination reaching 0.331. Conclusions: The application of APACHE II in Taiwan's ICUs as the only standard severity measure is justifiable based on our findings. MODS appears to have a better expense predictive power. However, the expense predictive power of TISS was not as good as expected.

Original languageEnglish
JournalTzu Chi Medical Journal
Volume17
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2005

Fingerprint

APACHE
Organ Dysfunction Scores
Taiwan
Mortality
ROC Curve
Health Services
Delivery of Health Care
Costs and Cost Analysis
Clinical Studies
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • APACHE II
  • ICU
  • Severity of illness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

A comparative study of clinical severity scoring systems in ICUs in Taiwan. / Tang, Chao Hsiun; Yang, Che Ming; Chuang, Chi Yuan; Chang, Ming Lee; Huang, Yu Chwen; Huang, Chin Feng.

In: Tzu Chi Medical Journal, Vol. 17, No. 4, 08.2005.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tang, Chao Hsiun ; Yang, Che Ming ; Chuang, Chi Yuan ; Chang, Ming Lee ; Huang, Yu Chwen ; Huang, Chin Feng. / A comparative study of clinical severity scoring systems in ICUs in Taiwan. In: Tzu Chi Medical Journal. 2005 ; Vol. 17, No. 4.
@article{6d76624ace864852806f507cca32b6c1,
title = "A comparative study of clinical severity scoring systems in ICUs in Taiwan",
abstract = "Objective: The objective of this study is to compare the performance of five commonly applied severity measures. Severity scoring systems have been developed in response to an increased emphasis on the evaluation and monitoring of health care services. The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II system is the only one that has been widely applied in Taiwan. This study is designed to ascertain the outcome prediction abilities of various severity measures in ICUs in Taiwan. Materials and Methods: All five severity instruments were applied to the same patient sample to assess the correlations and relative performance of all five systems. The data collection process was done in a 600-bed regional hospital with 101 valid cases recorded. Results: All five major severity scores, Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score (MODS), Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS), APACHE II, Mortality Probability Model 24 (MPM24), and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS), significantly correlated with each other. The accuracy of mortality prediction of each measure ranged from 0.71 to 0.88 as illustrated by the area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. The predictive power of each severity measure against the total expenses for each admission was poor in light of the fact that the only significant coefficient of determination was as low as 0.064. APACHE II's performance was as good as all the other systems. MODS performed better in predicting costs of surgical cases with the coefficient of determination reaching 0.331. Conclusions: The application of APACHE II in Taiwan's ICUs as the only standard severity measure is justifiable based on our findings. MODS appears to have a better expense predictive power. However, the expense predictive power of TISS was not as good as expected.",
keywords = "APACHE II, ICU, Severity of illness",
author = "Tang, {Chao Hsiun} and Yang, {Che Ming} and Chuang, {Chi Yuan} and Chang, {Ming Lee} and Huang, {Yu Chwen} and Huang, {Chin Feng}",
year = "2005",
month = "8",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
journal = "Tzu Chi Medical Journal",
issn = "1016-3190",
publisher = "財團法人中華民國佛教慈濟慈善事業基金會",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative study of clinical severity scoring systems in ICUs in Taiwan

AU - Tang, Chao Hsiun

AU - Yang, Che Ming

AU - Chuang, Chi Yuan

AU - Chang, Ming Lee

AU - Huang, Yu Chwen

AU - Huang, Chin Feng

PY - 2005/8

Y1 - 2005/8

N2 - Objective: The objective of this study is to compare the performance of five commonly applied severity measures. Severity scoring systems have been developed in response to an increased emphasis on the evaluation and monitoring of health care services. The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II system is the only one that has been widely applied in Taiwan. This study is designed to ascertain the outcome prediction abilities of various severity measures in ICUs in Taiwan. Materials and Methods: All five severity instruments were applied to the same patient sample to assess the correlations and relative performance of all five systems. The data collection process was done in a 600-bed regional hospital with 101 valid cases recorded. Results: All five major severity scores, Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score (MODS), Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS), APACHE II, Mortality Probability Model 24 (MPM24), and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS), significantly correlated with each other. The accuracy of mortality prediction of each measure ranged from 0.71 to 0.88 as illustrated by the area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. The predictive power of each severity measure against the total expenses for each admission was poor in light of the fact that the only significant coefficient of determination was as low as 0.064. APACHE II's performance was as good as all the other systems. MODS performed better in predicting costs of surgical cases with the coefficient of determination reaching 0.331. Conclusions: The application of APACHE II in Taiwan's ICUs as the only standard severity measure is justifiable based on our findings. MODS appears to have a better expense predictive power. However, the expense predictive power of TISS was not as good as expected.

AB - Objective: The objective of this study is to compare the performance of five commonly applied severity measures. Severity scoring systems have been developed in response to an increased emphasis on the evaluation and monitoring of health care services. The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II system is the only one that has been widely applied in Taiwan. This study is designed to ascertain the outcome prediction abilities of various severity measures in ICUs in Taiwan. Materials and Methods: All five severity instruments were applied to the same patient sample to assess the correlations and relative performance of all five systems. The data collection process was done in a 600-bed regional hospital with 101 valid cases recorded. Results: All five major severity scores, Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score (MODS), Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS), APACHE II, Mortality Probability Model 24 (MPM24), and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS), significantly correlated with each other. The accuracy of mortality prediction of each measure ranged from 0.71 to 0.88 as illustrated by the area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. The predictive power of each severity measure against the total expenses for each admission was poor in light of the fact that the only significant coefficient of determination was as low as 0.064. APACHE II's performance was as good as all the other systems. MODS performed better in predicting costs of surgical cases with the coefficient of determination reaching 0.331. Conclusions: The application of APACHE II in Taiwan's ICUs as the only standard severity measure is justifiable based on our findings. MODS appears to have a better expense predictive power. However, the expense predictive power of TISS was not as good as expected.

KW - APACHE II

KW - ICU

KW - Severity of illness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23244448739&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23244448739&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:23244448739

VL - 17

JO - Tzu Chi Medical Journal

JF - Tzu Chi Medical Journal

SN - 1016-3190

IS - 4

ER -