精神衛生護理師實務能力展現考試之評價

戎瑾如, 蕭淑貞, 黃瑞媛, 邱冠龍, 周桂如, 陳碧霞

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Nursing clinical performance examinations have become a central professional and corporate issue. The purpose of this study was, by means of evaluation by experts, opinions of psychiatric nurses, and the results of the examinations, to explore the objectivity, acceptability, comparability and fairness of the Basic Psychiatric Nurses' Clinical Performance Examination. The 10 experts were highly knowledgeable about the form and content of the examination. Structured questionnaires were used to collect data from the 112 psychiatric nurses. These 112 psychiatric nurses, who participated in the examinations, had intermediate and high degrees of knowledge about the form and content of the examination. The results of this study support that the objectivity, comparability, acceptability, and fairness of the psychiatric clinical examinations can be effectively demonstrated and foster an evidence-based performance examination approach to psychiatric nursing professional.
Original languageTraditional Chinese
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
Journal精神衛生護理雜誌
Volume2
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Cite this